- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:01:17 -0600
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
<rabbitTrail>And at some point designers will face the fact that IDs are only one way to address into a document. There is more than one way to achieve an address for a link to use. IDs are a special case.</rabbitTrail> <phil>I don't believe we will solve the problems of intent without validation or muckery in the URI. Intent is documented and if documented by declaration, validatible. The more things hardwired in the xml namespace, the more XML is diminished.</phil> len From: Micah Dubinko [mailto:MDubinko@cardiff.com] If we're struggling with this, I don't feel good about how the less-geeky web designers out there will fare. What folks really need is a way to easily express author intent of links and IDs, without getting tangled in validation.
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 16:01:52 UTC