- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:11:38 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> was heard to say: | But its also true that the need for a ID solution becomes more acute | when a subsetted XML (that has no internal or external DTD subset) is | considered. You are absolutely correct. But I still want to keep them separate. Dave Orchard pushed back on the position I posted because (or at least in part because, or at least I think it was because) it didn't address xml:id. He's right. And that's the way I think it should stay. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Nothing will ever be attempted, if all XML Standards Architect | possible objections must be first Web Tech. and Standards | overcome.--Dr. Johnson Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+KB0qOyltUcwYWjsRAla0AKCgz8Bi9leU9VMRHEh5CRenSBw3TwCfcMbV omZX7aksshh3QGsM4I5+4aw= =cF7/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 10:12:32 UTC