- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:30:47 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> was heard to say: | Not blaming you personally, but your employer must carry much of the blame | for the course of events. If they had not protested so strongly at an early | stage about XML applications using the application/xml media type, we would | never have set up the ietf-xml-mime list, which led to the creation of RFC | 2376 (XML Media types). I think there are plenty of folks around that will argue that application/xml is usually a bad idea. I'm not sure I agree, but I certainly don't think taking pot shots at my employer is contributing to the discussion. |> On the other hand, one of the consequences xml:idAttr (and do a lesser |> extent xml:id) that bothers me is that it moves this validation |> semantic out into authoring space. One of the reasons that W3C XML |> Schema says that schema location information is only a hint is so that |> I can apply my own schema independent of what the author asked for. |> Well, what if I want to use some other attribute as an ID sometimes? |> It just seems to me that moving IDness into the document is a fairly |> significant can of worms. | | Actually xml:id doesn't *necessarily* break this. An attribute called xml:id | will always be of type ID, but not all attributes of type ID have to be | called xml:id. So if you want the property you describe above, by all means | use other names. Yes, but I can only have one attribute of type ID. |> If pushed, I think I could come to terms with the simple xml:id |> proposal, but the more complex variants look like too much complexity |> to me. | | One of the reasons I prefer xml:id is that it works with current software: | just add it to the DTD and go (if the processor doesn't read the DTD it | needs built-in knowledge of the ID attributes anyway), and it doesn't get in | the way of composibility (which an attribute on the root element does). Yep, good points. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | A man can believe a considerable deal of XML Standards Architect | rubbish, and yet go about his daily work in a Web Tech. and Standards | rational and cheerful manner.--Norman Douglas Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+Lw2HOyltUcwYWjsRAuY8AJ4uby9BxeyBIhsClO9qXKGcZppmFACgoYP5 l/OtKh94aPEG1fs2LY2K5zU= =w3FG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 16:31:00 UTC