www-html@w3.org from May 1996 by subject

"Journalism"

"KEY SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB" DOCUMENTED IN SECOND ISSUE OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB JOURNAL

(fwd)

(no subject)

(OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair

3.2 tables and the width attribute

<ALIGN=JUSTIFY>

<H1 SRC="foo.gif">

<hr> images

<link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html">

<math>, <fig>, ...

<math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)

<menu>, Style sheets ; was:Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3,

<OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0

<p align=indent>

<style> and <!-- comments -->

<style> and Wilbur

Abut inline graphics -- how?

Alpha testers wanted

Alternate source tags?

Archive with HTML 2.0 specs

Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)

Bandwidth

Bandwidth (fwd)

browser functions and HTML

bullets and lines

Call for Speakers

CDROM.COM & FixPack names?

Color Palette Re: Color Palette Spec?

Color Palette Spec?

Color Palette Spec? -Reply

Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ]

CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal....

CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... -Reply

CTP's UL, OL, LI proposal.....

Deprecating FONT and CENTER

Descending Ordered Lists

Digressions (was: Footnotes)

directory identifiers

Disappointed by Wilbur....

DIV/CLASS

DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2

DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd)

DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply

DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments]

DUH! (was:prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>)

Exclusions of blocks from <DIR> or <MENU>

excuse

Existing practice

FIG and OBJECT

Fixed page layout

Font-style vs. phrase elements

Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd)

Font-style...

For the future - requests for the W3C

For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd)

For the future...

Form Content Models [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ]

Futility of public forum

HTML 3.0

HTML 3.0 -Reply

HTML 3.2

HTML 3.2 -Reply

HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ]

HTML 3.2 and Frames

HTML 3.2 Content Models

HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting

HTML 3.2: BASE element

HTML 3.2: Bug in OL, LI attribute definition lists

HTML 3.2: HEAD content model

HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG

HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply

HTML 3.2: PRE, IMG, and tabbing

HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA)

HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing

HTML 3.xx & scalability

HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ]

HTML Plans [was: I am confused]

HTML3.2

HTML3.2 and the standards process

HTML3.2 DTD 15May96 comment

I am confused (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd))

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt

ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply)

IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text...

images as bullets in <UL>

IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ]

IMG in PRE?

IMG in PRE? -Reply

IMG TAG

Indexing the Web (was Re: What's wrong with <FONT>?)

Inline code a mistake?

Inline macros

Internationalization

Lexical details of HTML [was: DIV/CLASS ]

Lost Eudora email

MATH

Math-mode in HTML

MENU Content Model [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ]

META

Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility

More on list attributes, <HR>

More on Lists...

Move the "neurons" talk, please

Moving on...

Multipage Forms

My vote

My vote (fwd)

Need a new DTD for style sheets

New Tag Proposal

Non-browser uses of HTML

OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan

OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED!

Opening multiple frames

Palettes and bad rendering

Plaintext and depreciated elements

Practical Joke

PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification

Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI>

Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply

Proposal: New Anchor attributes

prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>

Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ]

Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd)

Question

QUESTION: <resource>, how would it work?

Re an earlier post about Expert Systems Protoype

removeme

Scripts, attributes and CRLF

Spacing

Spacing (was IMG in PRE?)

SRC and DINGBATS

Status of HTML 3.2 [was: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) ]

Style sheets not in HTML 3.2

summary of proposed revisions

summary of proposed revisions (fwd)

table usage (was Re: text on graphics?)

Tables

Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD

Tables draft advances to RFC

tables in AOL browser

Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd)

Take note Dan

Te <OBJECT> draft; was, FIG and OBJECT

text on graphics?

Underlining, (was: HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting -Reply)

Unique Names & content scope

Unique Names & content scope -Reply

URNs (Was: New Anchor attributes)

Web neurons

WebNet-96 Final CFP (San Francisco)

Welcome to www-html!

what *I* would do with Wilbur.

What's wrong with

What's wrong with <FONT>

What's wrong with <FONT>?

What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org!

Why a DTD for HTML 3.2?

Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd)

Wilbur

www-html-d Digest V96 #60

www-html-d Digest V96 #61

www-html-d Digest V96 #89

zorba

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 1996 23:46:25 UTC