- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 15:33:45 -0700
- To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>, "'boo@best.com'" <boo@best.com>
Absolutely not; I was referring to the STYLE attribute which allows direct embedding of style properties, as described in the HTML Style Embedding draft proposal. CLASS is still a linking mechanism... but CLASS may be useful outside of stylesheets, which is why I did not mention it, although I probably should have. Donning my flameproof vest, the bits that would probably have to be in the DTD for stylesheets would include: the <STYLE> tag (for containing stylesheets) the CLASS and ID attributes on all tags (for linking stylesheet selectors) the STYLE attribute on all tags (for directly embedding style properties) the <LINK> tag would also have to support REL=STYLESHEET. -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com -[- >---------- >From: boo@best.com[SMTP:boo@best.com] >Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 1996 12:50 PM >To: www-html@w3.org >Subject: RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 > >At 9:58a 05/14/96, Chris Wilson (PSD) wrote: >>At any rate, the stylesheet format itself >>would not go into HTML - only the embedding mechanisms (the STYLE tag, >>the <LINK REL=STYLESHEET> reference, and the STYLE attribute). > >Does this mean we will be using STYLE as the attribute, after all, >rather >than CLASS? > >________________________________________________________________________ >__ > Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, > Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, >HTML > http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, >Songwriter > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 1996 18:34:36 UTC