www-html@w3.org from May 1996 by author

Abigail

• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: images as bullets in <UL> (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: MATH (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)

Albert Lunde

• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] (Thursday, 16 May)

andreas@wni.co.jp

• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? (Monday, 13 May)
• HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames (Thursday, 9 May)

Angel Diaz

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)

Anita Sundaram

• Re an earlier post about Expert Systems Protoype (Monday, 6 May)

Arnoud

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: IMG TAG (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: images as bullets in <UL> (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)

Aron S. Spencer

• Descending Ordered Lists (Thursday, 16 May)

Art Pollard

• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Thursday, 30 May)

Assoc Advancement Computers Education

• WebNet-96 Final CFP (San Francisco) (Thursday, 23 May)

BearHeart / Bill Weinman

• Re: text on graphics? (Saturday, 11 May)
• New Tag Proposal (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Practical Joke (Wednesday, 8 May)

Ben Combee

• Exclusions of blocks from <DIR> or <MENU> (Friday, 10 May)

Benjamin C. W. Sittler

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Moving on... (Wednesday, 8 May)

Benjamin Franz

• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)

Bj|rn-Helge Mevik

• Re: MATH (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: MATH (Monday, 13 May)

Boleslaw Mynarski

• Re: CDROM.COM & FixPack names? (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Opening multiple frames (Wednesday, 1 May)

Brendan Seaton

• Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 (Tuesday, 14 May)

Brent Eades

• QUESTION: <resource>, how would it work? (Friday, 31 May)

Brian Behlendorf

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 May)

C. Len Bullard

• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)

Carl Johan Berglund

• URNs (Was: New Anchor attributes) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 (Friday, 24 May)

cdreagan@indyunix.iupui.edu

• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Thursday, 2 May)

Charles Peyton Taylor

• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply (Thursday, 30 May)
• Need a new DTD for style sheets (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Underlining, (was: HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting -Reply) (Monday, 27 May)
• DUH! (was:prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link> (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... -Reply (Tuesday, 21 May)
• ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) (Saturday, 18 May)
• <style> and <!-- comments --> (Friday, 17 May)
• <style> and Wilbur (Friday, 17 May)
• Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply (Friday, 17 May)
• images as bullets in <UL> (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply (Wednesday, 15 May)
• <menu>, Style sheets ; was:Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)
• Plaintext and depreciated elements (Friday, 10 May)
• 3.2 tables and the width attribute (Friday, 10 May)
• what *I* would do with Wilbur. (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply (Thursday, 9 May)
• bullets and lines (Wednesday, 8 May)
• META (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Unique Names & content scope -Reply (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? -Reply (Friday, 3 May)

Chris Josephes

• Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI proposal..... (Thursday, 23 May)
• More on Lists... (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: images as bullets in <UL> (Friday, 17 May)
• SRC and DINGBATS (Tuesday, 14 May)
• FIG and OBJECT (Saturday, 11 May)
• Disappointed by Wilbur.... (Wednesday, 8 May)

Chris Spurgeon

• Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? (Tuesday, 7 May)

Chris Wilson (PSD)

• RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)

Christopher Russell

• Abut inline graphics -- how? (Tuesday, 7 May)

Chuck Norris

• Re: Palettes and bad rendering (Friday, 3 May)

Colin P. A. Kennedy

• Re: Web neurons (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: IMG TAG (Saturday, 18 May)
• IMG TAG (Saturday, 18 May)

Craig Tinsley

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Thursday, 23 May)

Dan Delaney

• IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)
• Color Palette Spec? (Thursday, 2 May)

Daniel W. Connolly

• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Wednesday, 29 May)
• HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please (Saturday, 25 May)
• Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] (Thursday, 16 May)
• IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] (Thursday, 16 May)
• Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] (Thursday, 16 May)
• Lexical details of HTML [was: DIV/CLASS ] (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (Monday, 13 May)
• HTML Plans [was: I am confused] (Friday, 10 May)
• MENU Content Model [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Form Content Models [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] (Friday, 10 May)
• Status of HTML 3.2 [was: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) ] (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 and the standards process (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Monday, 6 May)
• "KEY SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB" DOCUMENTED IN SECOND ISSUE OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB JOURNAL (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Alternate source tags? (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Dave Carter

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: summary of proposed revisions (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• HTML 3.0 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Thursday, 2 May)

Dave Hollander

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 31 May)

Dave Raggett

• Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)

David Ornstein

• Alpha testers wanted (Monday, 20 May)

David Peilow

• Multipage Forms (Friday, 31 May)

Davide Musella

• Re: META (Thursday, 9 May)

DBERLIN

• Re: (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair (Thursday, 9 May)

Dianne Gorman

• Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models (Wednesday, 8 May)
• HTML 3.2 Content Models (Wednesday, 8 May)

Domingo Siliceo

• Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute (Sunday, 12 May)

Drazen Kacar

• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)

Edward Welbourne

• Math-mode in HTML (Thursday, 23 May)

erik

• zorba (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Inline code a mistake? (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Inline macros (Monday, 6 May)

FAYYAZ@neda.net.ir

• (no subject) (Saturday, 4 May)

Fil Mackay

• RE: Web neurons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Tuesday, 21 May)

Fisher Mark

• RE: IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• RE: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Non-browser uses of HTML (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• RE: Non-browser uses of HTML (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

Foteos Macrides

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Take note Dan (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... (Thursday, 9 May)

Francois Stragier

• Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Gerald Oskoboiny

• Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)

Greg Fuller - GFULLER.US.ORACLE.COM

• removeme (Monday, 13 May)

Greg Kostello

• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 16 May)

Gregory J. Woodhouse

• Re: Bandwidth (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Inline code a mistake? (Monday, 6 May)

Hakon Lie

• RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Tuesday, 14 May)

Harold A. Driscoll

• Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• HTML 3.2: BASE element (Tuesday, 21 May)

Ian S. Graham

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Wednesday, 29 May)

Ingo Macherius

• Re: Moving on... (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Existing practice (Wednesday, 8 May)

Internet-Drafts@cnri.reston.va.us

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt (Wednesday, 29 May)

James K. Tauber

• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Wilbur (Wednesday, 8 May)

James Tauber

• Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Font-style... (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Moving on... (Wednesday, 8 May)

Jim Taylor

• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply (Friday, 17 May)

Joe English

• Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• HTML 3.2: HEAD content model (Thursday, 16 May)
• HTML 3.2: Bug in OL, LI attribute definition lists (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models (Friday, 10 May)

John Middlemas

• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Sunday, 26 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Web neurons (Thursday, 23 May)
• Web neurons (Tuesday, 21 May)

Jonas Liljegren

• Re: <H1 src="foo.gif"> (Monday, 13 May)
• <H1 src="foo.gif"> (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)

Jonsm@aol.com

• Fixed page layout (Saturday, 18 May)
• Scripts, attributes and CRLF (Saturday, 18 May)

Kay Martha Quittan

• excuse (Sunday, 26 May)

Keith Instone

• IMG in PRE? (Sunday, 12 May)

Kevin J. Dyer

• (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair (Thursday, 9 May)

Lee Daniel Crocker

• Re: Need a new DTD for style sheets (Thursday, 30 May)
• Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility (Saturday, 25 May)
• Move the "neurons" talk, please (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Font-style... (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Existing practice (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Non-browser uses of HTML (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Futility of public forum (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Internationalization (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Palettes and bad rendering (Friday, 3 May)

Len Bullard

• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Monday, 27 May)

levitte@lp.se

• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)

Lineaer Algebraiker

• Re: My vote (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: MATH (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: MATH (Sunday, 12 May)
• MATH (Saturday, 11 May)
• Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Unique Names & content scope (Sunday, 5 May)
• <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> (Wednesday, 1 May)

Marc Girod

• <p align=indent> (Friday, 31 May)

Marc Salomon

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (Tuesday, 21 May)

Marcus E. Hennecke

• Deprecating FONT and CENTER (Friday, 31 May)
• Tables draft advances to RFC (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: images as bullets in <UL> (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 9 May)
• RE: Non-browser uses of HTML (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 9 May)

Martin Gleeson

• Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD (Thursday, 30 May)

Mary Holstege

• Re: DIV/CLASS (Wednesday, 15 May)

Matthew James Marnell

• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Monday, 27 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

Maurizio Codogno

• Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: For the future... (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Saturday, 11 May)

MegaZone

• Re: <p align=indent> (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: summary of proposed revisions (fwd) (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) (Thursday, 16 May)
• My vote (fwd) (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• For the future - requests for the W3C (Monday, 13 May)
• Take note Dan (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: (fwd) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Bandwidth (fwd) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)
• <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? (Tuesday, 7 May)

Melt van Schoor

• text on graphics? (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Welcome to www-html! (Thursday, 9 May)

Michael Seaton

• RE: IMG TAG (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: Inline macros (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> (Wednesday, 1 May)

Michal Young

• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE, IMG, and tabbing (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 May)

Mike Altimore

• Re: directory identifiers (Wednesday, 15 May)
• directory identifiers (Wednesday, 15 May)

Mike Culver

• Call for Speakers (Friday, 10 May)

Mike Meyer

• Re: DIV/CLASS (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Re: (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT> (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Re: <H1 SRC="foo.gif"> (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: What's wrong with (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Palettes and bad rendering (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

Mike Wexler

• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 7 May)

Modibo Samake

• HTML 3.2 and Frames (Wednesday, 8 May)

Murray Altheim

• Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Palettes and bad rendering (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Nil E. Alexandrov

• Question (Thursday, 9 May)

Nina Lewis

• Re: OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED! (Thursday, 9 May)

Oliver Christ

• Re: Archive with HTML 2.0 specs (Wednesday, 8 May)

OnSiteCPU@aol.com

• Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #61 (Wednesday, 1 May)

Paul Derbyshire

• Practical Joke (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Opening multiple frames (Thursday, 2 May)

Paul Fidler

• Re: PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification (Monday, 13 May)

Paul Jones

• Re: ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)

Paul Prescod

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. (Thursday, 9 May)
• HTML3.2 and the standards process (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Moving on... (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Moving on... (Wednesday, 8 May)
• "Journalism" (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Inline code a mistake? (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

Paul Treadaway

• Re: Math-mode in HTML (Friday, 24 May)

Priscilla Johnson

• Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #89 (Wednesday, 15 May)

Ray Davis

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Welcome to www-html! (Thursday, 9 May)
• Welcome to www-html! (Tuesday, 7 May)

Robert S. Thau

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 May)

Ron Newman

• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Monday, 20 May)

Ron Schnell

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)

S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk

• HTML3.2 DTD 15May96 comment (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

schwarte

• <math>, <fig>, ... (Thursday, 9 May)

schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de

• I am confused (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)

Scott E. Preece

• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Font-style... (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: What's wrong with (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: Non-browser uses of HTML (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) (Wednesday, 1 May)

Shawn Steele

• Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: <hr> images (Wednesday, 15 May)
• My vote (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Bandwidth (Friday, 10 May)
• Bandwidth (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Color Palette Spec? (Friday, 3 May)

Simon Cox

• Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes (Saturday, 25 May)

Simon Greenberg

• Color Palette Re: Color Palette Spec? (Thursday, 2 May)

Srivastava Nandini

• HTML 3.0 (Friday, 24 May)

Stavros Macrakis

• Re: Spacing (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)

Steve Heaney

• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)

Steven Ball

• Re: Moving on... (Thursday, 9 May)

Steven Clift

• HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting (Monday, 27 May)

Stuart Harris

• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)

T. Joseph W. Lazio

• Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Indexing the Web (was Re: What's wrong with <FONT>?) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)

Thomas Reardon

• RE: Fixed page layout (Monday, 20 May)

Thomas van Gulick

• Re: Tables (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Tables (Saturday, 18 May)

VidaesLoca@aol.com

• Re: Call for Speakers (Saturday, 11 May)

Walter Ian Kaye

• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please (Sunday, 26 May)
• Re: Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility (Sunday, 26 May)
• RE: Web neurons (Friday, 24 May)
• Lost Eudora email (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Tables (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: Tables (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: IMG TAG (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: Descending Ordered Lists (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: DIV/CLASS (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) (Saturday, 11 May)
• table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: text on graphics? (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: tables in AOL browser (Monday, 6 May)

Warren Steel

• summary of proposed revisions (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Font-style... (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (Monday, 20 May)
• More on list attributes, <HR> (Friday, 17 May)
• Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> (Friday, 17 May)
• OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Te <OBJECT> draft; was, FIG and OBJECT (Monday, 13 May)
• PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification (Monday, 13 May)
• browser functions and HTML (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? (Saturday, 11 May)
• What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! (Friday, 10 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 1996 23:46:25 UTC