- From: Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 18:50:30 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 6:00p 05/10/96, Marcus E. Hennecke wrote: >On Fri, 10 May 1996 17:34:59 -0700, boo@best.com (Walter Ian Kaye) wrote: >> Mis-use? Since when is resourcefulness a bad thing? > >It is not of course. However, you have to be sure to distinguish between >actual resources and certain browser features. I would call it a mis-use >if it would in any way limit my audience. This may happen if I mark >something up as a table when in fact it is not. Well, in my case it is a table of hypertext links. Perfectly valid. :) >> The hallmark of a cool >> application is when users can make it do things which the developers never >> dreamed of. > >Well, then you have just narrowed yourself to that particular application. >However, if you are talking about HTML you need to be aware that certain >"cool" tricks actually fail quite miserably when applied to a browser >that is in any way different from the author's (e.g. different browser, >different platform, different configuration). Yes, I do in fact keep an awareness of these things, and if I receive email describing a user's difficulty with one of my pages, I do whatever I can to accomodate that situation. However, such things usually are due to the user having an incorrect video setup -- they change it, and suddenly every page they view looks better, not just mine! ;) >Of course, you can do on your homepage whatever you want to and if you >want to limit your audience to Netscape 2.0, that's fine with me. Oh, I don't limit my audience in any such way. My frames page looks just fine in the AOL browser and in Lynx. It just looks *better* in Netscape. >> On my personal home page ("Walter's Web"), I use a combination >> of Netscape frames and tables to create a scrolling list of graphic buttons >> which are overlaid with real text. > >I just need to change the font size and your buttons start looking >awfully cramped or they do not line up anymore. I'll shorten the titles then. :) >However, I do hand >you this: at least I *can* set my font and font size, this would be >impossible if the buttons were actual images. Yep, this is the advantage! :D (And of course a lot easier to modify!) >BTW, I am browsing in 14pt Lucida Sans Serif (B&H). It's much easier >on the eyes than 12pt Times. Yeah, Lucida was designed to be raster-friendly. I'll have to get a copy one of these days... -Walter __________________________________________________________________________ Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Friday, 10 May 1996 21:50:37 UTC