- From: Joe English <joe@trystero.art.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 11:45:02 PDT
- To: www-html@w3.org
Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Actually, read the description of HTML 3.2 - it is intended to document
> CURRENT PRACTICE.
Ah. Thanks for clearing that up.
I had been somewhat dismayed by the header comment which says:
| HTML 3.2 aims to capture recommended practice as of early '96
^^^^^^^^^^^
| and as such to be used as a replacement for HTML 2.0 (RFC 1866).
since the DTD does not in fact enforce most of the principles of
HTML "recommended practice" with which I am familiar. Since
there are errors and inaccuracies in other comments I suppose
this one needn't be taken at face value either; if it's intended
to _document current practice_ instead that puts things in a
better perspective.
By the way, the formal part of the DTD has (at least) two bugs.
--Joe English
joe@art.com
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 1996 14:45:10 UTC