- From: Chris Josephes <cpj1@winternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 22:29:20 -0500 (CDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Quote from MegaZone ---------------------------------- Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 19:15:00 -0700 (PDT) From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com> To: www-html@w3.org Subject: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd) Message-Id: <199605110215.TAA29990@server.livingston.com> Content-Type: text content-length: 1017 I did see your example of what FIG could do that OBJECT couldn't - but doesn't it make more sense to simply expand object to encompass everything FIG does sice it already does some of it? And then we don't have to have two tags that overlap and duplicate efforts, instead we can have one tag that is extensible and flexible. -MZ ----------------------- I think the OVERLAY,CREDIT and CAPTION tags from FIG would have been pretty useful myself. I suppose they could easily be added to OBJECT as well. CAPTION & CREDIT won't degrade easily, but they didn't when they were used with FIG either. Was the reasoning for dropping FIG just because it'd be easier to give OBJECT the ability to "float" on it's own? ----------------------- Christopher P. Josephes ---------------------------- Email | mailto:cpj1@winternet.com Web | http://www.winternet.com/~cpj1/
Received on Friday, 10 May 1996 23:29:22 UTC