Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)

Am I a pariah for thinking that the functionality which <math> hopes 
to encompass would be much better suited to a different data type 
altogether, embedded in HTML using <object> rather than trying to 
squeeze it into HTML proper?  Separating it out makes implementation 10x 
easier (just distribute plug-ins), makes evolution independent from HTML, 
and gives authors a number of ways to represent their data (i.e., I might 
have the Mathematica data type, the postscript version, and a GIF 
version, and content-negotiate between them).

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  |  We're hiring!  http://www.organic.com/Home/Info/Jobs/

Received on Tuesday, 21 May 1996 14:46:36 UTC