- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 00:41:19 -0400
- To: murray@spyglass.com (Murray Altheim)
- Cc: Francois Stragier <stragier@email.enst.fr>, www-html@w3.org
In message <v02110100adaa925d026e@[140.186.34.50]>, Murray Altheim writes: On talking >with some folks here at Spyglass, we use "NOTATION", as the more formal >SGML term already in use in other places. So, as an example with CODE and >PRE: > > <PRE NOTATION="text/pascal"> > NumToStr(paramPtr, theID, IDStr); > NumToStr(paramPtr, SizeResource(theResource), sizeStr); > BlockMove(@theType, POINTER(ORD4(@typeStr)+1), 4); > </PRE> We considered that, but text/pascall _isn't_ a notation in the sense of <!notation ...>. And making it a notation would mean changing the DTD every time a new data format is added, breaking down independence between HTML and stylesheets (and graphic formats and...). That, or supporting <!notation ...> declarations on a per-document basis. But it seemed silly to have the notation attribute be a pointer to a <!notation ...> declaration at the top of a document, which was just a pointer to a MIME type, ala: <!notation css system "text/css"> when <style type="text/css"> accomplishes the same thing. So we chose type, as a mnemonic short-hand for content-type or media-type, in the RFC1522 (MIME) sense. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 1996 00:41:31 UTC