- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 16:07:54 -0400
- To: "Harold A. Driscoll" <harold@driscoll.chi.il.us>
- Cc: marc@pele.ckm.ucsf.edu (Marc Salomon), www-html@w3.org
In message <2.2.16.19960522140957.3f4fdea0@pop.interaccess.com>, "Harold A. Dri scoll" writes: > >>The proposed 3.2 DTD is an arbitrary subset of "current practice." > >Yes, it is "an arbitrary subset," but certainly a considered subset. I think >most of us would prefer a more "perfect" DTD. But that has not been >forthcoming On the other hand, I wouldn't mind seeing such a thing. For example, I've hacked something up. See: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-pubtext/report/ (in the context of: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-pubtext/ ) which is something I'd like to see used for technical reports on the web. See also: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/SGML/spec-mgmt Dan
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 1996 16:08:01 UTC