With HTML 3.2 being ironed out, is it time to allow IMG in PRE?
I read the discussion on www-html from back in January on this topic
and still do not see a good reason to exclude IMG from within PRE.
Dan Connolly admits it might have just been an oversight a long
time ago. Lots of people have found good uses for IMG in PRE. Why
not make it officially valid?


Received on Sunday, 12 May 1996 13:57:15 UTC