- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 02:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Once upon a time schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de shaped the electrons to say... >I don t see ANY reason to eliminate these HTML-features. Why do I get thie feeling you didn't read my first reply? <MATH> is *not* dead - you just *do not* put tags that are not ready in an official DTD like 3.2. You *must* understand that '3.0' was purely experimental and 3.2 is not. <FIG> on the other hand is dead - because <OBJECT> is *better*. Why would you want to cripple yourself with a weaker tag? Let it die and move on to the future. -MZ -- Although I work for Livingston Enterprises Technical Support, I alone am responsible for everything contained herein. So don't waste my managers' time bitching to them if you don't like something I've said. Flame me. Phone: 800-458-9966 support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> FAX: 510-426-8951 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Friday, 10 May 1996 05:36:33 UTC