- From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 08:15:29 -0500
- To: megazone@livingston.com
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com> | | So you want to *force* <DIV> to be used? Why??? Right not the | implementations I've seen add whitespace, and making headers just the | first line of a <DIV>? So how about subheaders, I'd need a div on each | subheader in a FAQ? | | No thanks, no way in hell I'd use that. There is no reason to force DIV | to be used dozens of times in a document like that. --- Well, some of us think it is a serious mistake that the HTML DTD fails to associate headers with any particular part of the document. The current HTML H* tags are, in many ways, presentation markup, rather than structural markup - they indicate that the text is to be styled like a header, but they don't adequately indicate what the heading heads or, for that matter, unambiguously place it in a hierarchy of sections, since the author is not constrained to observe the numerical relationships between header types. It would have been better to have a tag that defines a section of the document and contains a header as part of its content. This would have made the association between a given heading and a given section of the document much clearer. Among other things, this would make it possible for a retrieval system to retrieve a section of a document, rather than always retrieving a complete page, and to do search logic based on keywords within a section, rather than within the whole page. The proposed use of DIV would enforce a clear hierrarchy of sections in a document. This would be significantly better structural markup. scott -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550 internet mail: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 1996 09:18:24 UTC