Re: HTML 3.2

> I think it's obvious - it preempts the presumption that 3.0 is "more
> valid" than this version.  Too many people still expected that 3.0 was
> where the standard was going.  Since there's no way to "erase" 3.0,
> using a higher number makes it clearer that 3.2, rather than 3.0, is
> the thing to look at.

"The future isn't what it used to be."


Received on Wednesday, 8 May 1996 13:42:54 UTC