- From: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 10:48:14 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
>>> Hakon Lie <howcome@w3.org> 05/18/96 05:04am >>> >Chris Josephes writes: > > > clear that there have been no less than seven attributes declared for UL > > alone (from Warren), so I would like to recommend that these attributes > > be logically broken down into "structure" and "presentation" depending on > > their function. I would then urge that some of the "presentation" > > attributes be moved over to style sheets to keep things a bit less complex. > >Agreed, but for different reasons. I will not argue that style sheets are not the better way of doing things, but they are not supported in browsers today (although the messages from Chris Wilson and Thomas Reardon give hope that they will be soon.) Images (as in <img>) are used now, so it seemed reasonable to use the attributes from the <IMG> tag. Also, even though they have the list-style property, they do not *yet* have a means of specifying height and width values, which, as I said before, make a dramatic difference in the speed at which a document is displayed. I agree that this is presentation-based, rather than content-based, but it was closer to being content-based markup than <DL> <dd> <img> "our first bullet" </DL> which is being frequently used today. I am not the first person to ask for this, remember, it was in the March 95 HTML 3 draft (and probably was being asked for long before then.) <snip!> >Right. I don't care too much for the "ding-" prefix, but I'm sure >we can agree on some naming mechanism. See [1] for a list of >"HTML predefined icon-like symbols". > >[1] http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-wwwicn While these are useful, they are closer to being icons than dingbats, IMHO. They remind me of a collection of images I use called Qbullets: http://www.matterform.com/mf/qbullets/aboutqbullets.html Is there a public domain collection of dingbats? I've just looked at the characters in the Wingdings font, and it contains some of the icon entities, as does Zapf Dingbats, although Zapf Dingbats seem more ornamental. The problem is the Wingdings font comes with Windows, and Zapf Dingbats comes with Macintosh. It would be nifty if some design school did a collection of dingbats as a project or something and put them on the internet in Mac, PC, and X-windows (whatever format that is) formats. >CSS1 is closed at this point, but the things we discuss could >potentially get into the next round. What are the chances of browser vendors adding their own properties as they did with HTML tags and attributes? I wonder if we'll end up using Netscape tags and Microsoft styles :) >Regards, >-h&kon >Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France >http://www.w3.org/people/howcome howcome@w3.org C h a r l e s P e y t o n T a y l o r ctaylor@nps.navy.mil The opinions and views expressed ## even though we're on our own, are my own and do not reflect ## we are never all alone, Those of the Naval PostGraduate School ## when we are singing, singing. http://vislab-www.nps.navy.mil/%7ectaylor/
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 1996 13:43:48 UTC