- From: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 10:48:14 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
>>> Hakon Lie <howcome@w3.org> 05/18/96 05:04am >>>
>Chris Josephes writes:
>
> > clear that there have been no less than seven attributes
declared for UL
> > alone (from Warren), so I would like to recommend that these
attributes
> > be logically broken down into "structure" and "presentation"
depending on
> > their function. I would then urge that some of the
"presentation"
> > attributes be moved over to style sheets to keep things a bit
less complex.
>
>Agreed, but for different reasons.
I will not argue that style sheets are not the better
way of doing things, but they are not supported in
browsers today (although the messages from Chris
Wilson and Thomas Reardon give hope that they will
be soon.)
Images (as in <img>) are used now, so it
seemed reasonable to use the attributes
from the <IMG> tag.
Also, even though they have the list-style
property, they do not *yet* have a means of
specifying height and width values, which, as I
said before, make a dramatic difference in the
speed at which a document is displayed.
I agree that this is presentation-based, rather
than content-based, but it was closer to being
content-based markup than <DL> <dd>
<img> "our first bullet" </DL> which is being
frequently used today. I am not the first
person to ask for this, remember, it was in
the March 95 HTML 3 draft (and probably was
being asked for long before then.)
<snip!>
>Right. I don't care too much for the "ding-" prefix, but I'm sure
>we can agree on some naming mechanism. See [1] for a list of
>"HTML predefined icon-like symbols".
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-wwwicn
While these are useful, they are closer to being
icons than dingbats, IMHO.
They remind me of a collection of images I use
called Qbullets:
http://www.matterform.com/mf/qbullets/aboutqbullets.html
Is there a public domain collection of dingbats?
I've just looked at the characters in the Wingdings
font, and it contains some of the icon entities,
as does Zapf Dingbats, although Zapf Dingbats seem
more ornamental. The problem is the Wingdings font
comes with Windows, and Zapf Dingbats comes with
Macintosh. It would be nifty if some design school
did a collection of dingbats as a project or something
and put them on the internet in Mac, PC, and X-windows
(whatever format that is) formats.
>CSS1 is closed at this point, but the things we discuss could
>potentially get into the next round.
What are the chances of browser vendors adding
their own properties as they did with HTML tags
and attributes? I wonder if we'll end up using
Netscape tags and Microsoft styles :)
>Regards,
>-h&kon
>Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France
>http://www.w3.org/people/howcome howcome@w3.org
C h a r l e s P e y t o n T a y l o r
ctaylor@nps.navy.mil
The opinions and views expressed ## even though we're on
our own,
are my own and do not reflect ## we are never all
alone,
Those of the Naval PostGraduate School ## when we are singing,
singing.
http://vislab-www.nps.navy.mil/%7ectaylor/
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 1996 13:43:48 UTC