- From: Stavros Macrakis <macrakis@osf.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 15:22:19 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
- Cc: abigail@tungsten.gn.iaf.nl
I suggested using non-breaking space for multiple spaces. Abigail <abigail@tungsten.gn.iaf.nl> rightly corrected me, saying: ...the HTML 3.0 description says that a non-breaking space should behave as normal space, with the exception of breaking a line at that point. Hence, "&nbps;&nbps;" should display as " " (one space). Thanks for the correction. I found (thank you, Alta Vista) some additional discussion of this at: http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/%7Eflavell/iso8859/iso8859-pointers.html#nbsp Apparently I am not the only one to have made this error. I do wonder, though, whether this is the appropriate definition to standardize on. Non-breaking space has the advantage of being a standard 8859-1 character, and requiring no special processing by most software, unlike entities like  , which cannot be represented in 8859-1 (although they are available in Unicode, I believe). As for Walter Ian Kaye's <boo@best.com> objection that non-breaking space is not code 32 (decimal), and therefore can't be used for cutting and pasting code, yes, that is true, but if you want to preserve the code at that level, I don't see how you're going to be able to do anything but <PRE>, as my comment-alignment example showed. -s
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 1996 15:22:31 UTC