- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 19:28:06 -0400
- To: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <s18cf442.087@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>, Charles Peyton Taylor writes: > >>Favorite Peeve: >>A document that is used by a large number of people should _not_ >>expire until an adequate substitute exists. It is rubbish that >>the >>HTML3 definition has expired, that is only a beaurocratic >>idiosyncrasy and a damn nuisance! Interesting... I didn't see him volunteer to maintain the document. The HTML 3.0 document was created by a cast of volunteers. The reason it went dormant was largely due to a lack of resources. >I do wish HTML 3 had been updated as a single >document. Now that W3C has funding to do this sort of thing... your wish is my command... Please see: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/ Dan
Received on Monday, 6 May 1996 19:28:06 UTC