- From: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 12:26:56 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
Microsoft is releasing a beta of internet Explorer 3.0, which they claim supports style sheets (I don't have Windows '95 right now so I can't test this out.) This means that style sheets are less of a rarely- supported, unstable feature and more of a reality on the web. A long while ago I added <link>s and classes to my documents so that my documents would be ready when styles were supported by major browser vendors. I've been trying to get people here where I work to validate their HTML documents, but I look pretty hypocritical when my documents (with style markup) don't validate. So I can either a) use only HTML 3 tags and validate under the HTML 3 DTD or b) take out style tags in all my documents (50 current) and use the wilbur DTD. I also used the <acronym> tag in case the blind were reading my pages, so if I use the wilbur DTD I can't use that tag, either. If I use the HTML 3 DTD, I can't use Width="100%" in my tables, which wouldn't be so bad if any browser understood the align=justify attribute. So you see, there is a need for a new DTD that encompasses all that wilbur has, plus styles, and, imho, <acronym>. How far along is cougar? I could write a DTD, but I would be guessing whether it was done right or not. (My SGML experience is what I've done with HTML.) As it is now, wilbur is harmful to propagation of style sheets. (IMHO, of course, but I'd be doubtful of any argument.)
Received on Thursday, 30 May 1996 15:23:17 UTC