w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2006 by date

Friday, 22 December 2006

• Re: WAI presentations in January 2007 Andy Mabbett

Thursday, 21 December 2006

• WAI presentations in January 2007 Shawn Henry
• European forum in Paris, January 29, 2007 Sylvie Duchateau

Wednesday, 20 December 2006

• Call for Review: WAI-ARIA Suite updated Working Drafts Michael Cooper
• Call for Review: HTTP Vocabulary in RDF Working Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra

Monday, 18 December 2006

• Re: [WD]: [ANN] New release of the W3C CSS Validator - Fuji Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available Christopher Hoffman

Friday, 15 December 2006

• New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available Jon Gunderson

Thursday, 14 December 2006

• Non-data tables and accessibility Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com

Wednesday, 13 December 2006

• WAT for Opera 1.1 released Steven Faulkner

Friday, 8 December 2006

• Open Document Format (ODF) Accessibility Testing Tool Jon Gunderson

Thursday, 7 December 2006

• Call for Review: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Working Draft Judy Brewer

Monday, 4 December 2006

• Re: There is a structural fault with WCAG2. That editing won ’t resolve. Andy Mabbett
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 2 December 2006

• Re: correct use of tfoot Christopher Hoffman
• Re: correct use of tfoot David Woolley
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys John Foliot

Friday, 1 December 2006

• Re: There is no structural fault with WCAG2. Phill Jenkins
• There is a structural fault with WCAG2. That editing won’t resolve. Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: correct use of tfoot John Foliot
• Re: correct use of tfoot Orion Adrian
• RE: correct use of tfoot John Foliot
• correct use of tfoot Antony Tennant
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 25 November 2006

• Re: FW: [accessbangla] Kofi Annan: Make the Internet available to everyone Andy Mabbett
• FW: [accessbangla] Kofi Annan: Make the Internet available to everyone George Kerscher
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 23 November 2006

• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... cstrobbe
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... John Colby
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... David Woolley

Wednesday, 22 November 2006

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Accessys@smart.net
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... John Foliot
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Swan, Henny
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Accessys@smart.net
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Chris Harpin
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... John Colby
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Andy Mabbett
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... John Colby
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Chris Harpin
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Matthew Smith
• [WebAIM]: a translation question ... Tim Smithers
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell

Tuesday, 21 November 2006

• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Orion Adrian
• Standards - was getting OT Re: [WebAIM] More data ... Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Accessys@smart.net
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Public vs. Private information Janet Russeau
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 20 November 2006

• RE: Public vs. Private information John Foliot
• Re: Public vs. Private information Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Public vs. Private information John Foliot
• Re: Public vs. Private information vivienne trulock
• Re: Public vs. Private information Patrick H. Lauke
• Public vs. Private information John Foliot
• Tag library definition Elie Ciment

Sunday, 19 November 2006

• Re: RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Gian Sampson-Wild

Saturday, 18 November 2006

• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Eadie, David

Friday, 17 November 2006

• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? cstrobbe
• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Jenny Craven

Thursday, 16 November 2006

• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Chris Harpin
• Re: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Gian Sampson-Wild

Tuesday, 14 November 2006

• Re: WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 Shawn Henry
• Re: WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 Gregory J. Rosmaita

Monday, 13 November 2006

• WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 Shawn Henry
• Re: RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) Jens Meiert
• RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Fwd: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) Jens Meiert

Saturday, 11 November 2006

• Re: Alternative text Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Alternative text Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Alternative text Patrick H. Lauke

Friday, 10 November 2006

• RE: Alternative text Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Alternative text Paul Novitski
• Re: Alternative text Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Alternative text Cindy Sue Causey
• Re: Alternative text Debi Orton
• Re: Alternative text Paul Novitski
• W4A 2007 First Call for Papers Yeliz Yesilada
• Re: Alternative text Matt Lee
• Re: Alternative text Andy Mabbett
• Alternative text Matt Lee

Thursday, 9 November 2006

• When should I start using WCAG 2.0? Phill Jenkins
• WAI IG: New WCAG 2 FAQ available Shawn Henry

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

• [WebAIM] About anti-robot form validation Ricci Angela
• Re: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) David Woolley

Monday, 6 November 2006

• RE: Breadcrumbs Eadie, David
• RE: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) John Foliot
• Re: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) David Woolley
• Re: Breadcrumbs Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Breadcrumbs Phill Jenkins
• @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) John Foliot
• Breadcrumbs Eadie, David
• Breadcrumbs Eadie, David
• Cross-posting [was: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)] Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell

Sunday, 5 November 2006

• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Matthew Smith
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) pewtah@snafu.de

Friday, 3 November 2006

• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) David Woolley
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Lachlan Hunt
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Andy Mabbett
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Lachlan Hunt
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Andy Mabbett
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Andy Mabbett
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Joshue O Connor
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Andy Mabbett
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• RE:More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Andy Mabbett
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Joshue O Connor
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Joshue O Connor

Thursday, 2 November 2006

• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Alastair Campbell
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Colin Lieberman
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Christopher Hoffman
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Gez Lemon
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) Michael S Elledge
• More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) John Foliot - WATS.ca

Wednesday, 1 November 2006

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins

Tuesday, 31 October 2006

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Aaron Smith
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• Re: Testing screen reader configurations (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) Accessys@smart.net
• Testing screen reader configurations (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Derek Featherstone

Monday, 30 October 2006

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John M Slatin
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John M Slatin
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Aaron Smith
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John M Slatin
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John Foliot
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge

Friday, 27 October 2006

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Christopher Hoffman
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge
• Re: SMIL - IIS Server Joshue O Connor
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Eadie, David
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Marc Faeh
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Eadie, David
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Lois Wakeman

Thursday, 26 October 2006

• FW: SMIL - IIS Server -> Flash Captioning Cynthia King
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility David Woolley
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server John Foliot
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Christopher Hoffman
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Geoff Stephens
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Julian Scarlett
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Andy Laws
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: SMIL - IIS Server Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server Patrick Lauke
• SMIL - IIS Server Jackir ASSAN ALY

Tuesday, 24 October 2006

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Jon Ribbens

Monday, 23 October 2006

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Christopher Hoffman
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Eadie, David
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Jon Ribbens

Sunday, 22 October 2006

• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes Terrence Wood

Saturday, 21 October 2006

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Eadie, David

Friday, 20 October 2006

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Christopher Hoffman
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Phill Jenkins
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Robert Yonaitis
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility David Woolley
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility King, Philip
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - Checkpoints 11.2 and 3.7 David Woolley
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Stuart Smith
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Phill Jenkins
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins

Thursday, 19 October 2006

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins
• WCAG 1.0 - Checkpoints 11.2 and 3.7 Jackir ASSAN ALY
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility John Foliot
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Christopher Hoffman
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Christopher Hoffman
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? David Woolley
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? John Foliot
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Phill Jenkins
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Christopher Hoffman
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Geoff Stephens
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Geoff Stephens
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Michael S Elledge
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Felix Miata
• RE: Drop down menus (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) Alastair Campbell
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: Assistive technologies Accessys@smart.net
• Consider supporting Web accessibility sessions for SXSW 2007 conference Shawn Henry
• Drop down menus (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) John Foliot
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• RE: Assistive technologies John Foliot
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• Re: Assistive technologies Martin Stehle
• Re: Assistive technologies Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? John Foliot
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Bailey, Bruce
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Bailey, Bruce
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Glenda L Sims
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Felix Miata
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Michael S Elledge
• Assistive technologies Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Jon Ribbens
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Bailey, Bruce
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Glenda L Sims
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Stuart Smith

Wednesday, 18 October 2006

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Geoff Stephens
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility Accessys@smart.net
• examples of sites with good accessibility Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• Involving Users and Role of Guidelines [was Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0?] Shawn Henry
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? John Foliot
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Joshue O Connor
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Stuart Smith
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com
• WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com

Tuesday, 17 October 2006

• RE: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes Lois Wakeman
• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes David Poehlman
• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes Charles McCathieNevile
• Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes Sylvie Duchateau

Thursday, 12 October 2006

• Re: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) Mark Birbeck

Wednesday, 11 October 2006

• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website Accessys@smart.net
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website Phill Jenkins
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Text navigation at bottom of pages Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 10 October 2006

• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website John Foliot
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Joshue O Connor
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website David Woolley
• Text navigation at bottom of pages Bianca Taulman
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Joshue O Connor
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Patrick H. Lauke

Monday, 9 October 2006

• Re: Best practices for screen readers David Woolley
• Re: Best practices for screen readers David Poehlman
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Joshue O Connor
• RE: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) Frances Berriman
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Andy Mabbett
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Christopher Hoffman

Sunday, 8 October 2006

• Re: Best practices for screen readers Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 7 October 2006

• Re: Best practices for screen readers Matthew Smith
• RE: Best practices for screen readers John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Jon Ribbens
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Joshue O Connor
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Roel Van Gils
• Re: Best practices for screen readers David Poehlman
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Christopher Hoffman

Friday, 6 October 2006

• Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) John Foliot
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website David Woolley
• Microformats & Semantic structure (was RE: Best practices for screen readers) John Foliot
• RE: Best practices for screen readers John Foliot
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Joshue O Connor
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Christopher Hoffman
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Andy Mabbett
• RE: Best practices for screen readers Frances Berriman
• Re: Best practices for screen readers Roel Van Gils
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Best practices for screen readers Léonie Watson
• Best practices for screen readers Bianca Taulman
• Rif: Subtitles with SAMI and SMIL Sebastiano.Nutarelli@csi.it
• Subtitles with SAMI and SMIL jassanaly@ipedis.com
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website David Woolley

Thursday, 5 October 2006

• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Christopher Hoffman
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website vivienne trulock
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Stuart Smith
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Joshue O Connor
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website David Poehlman
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Stuart Smith
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website Laboo
• Incorporating Flash into a Website Web Dandy Design

Last message date: Friday, 22 December 2006 18:27:11 UTC