w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2006 by author

Aaron Smith

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)

Accessys@smart.net

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Tuesday, 21 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: Testing screen reader configurations (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Assistive technologies (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Wednesday, 11 October)

Alastair Campbell

• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Tuesday, 21 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Drop down menus (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Cross-posting [was: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)] (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Friday, 6 October)

Andy Laws

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)

Andy Mabbett

• Re: WAI presentations in January 2007 (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: There is a structural fault with WCAG2. That editing won ’t resolve. (Monday, 4 December)
• Re: FW: [accessbangla] Kofi Annan: Make the Internet available to everyone (Saturday, 25 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE:More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com

• Non-data tables and accessibility (Thursday, 14 December)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• Assistive technologies (Thursday, 19 October)
• examples of sites with good accessibility (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)

Antony Tennant

• correct use of tfoot (Friday, 1 December)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)

Bianca Taulman

• Text navigation at bottom of pages (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (Monday, 4 December)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Standards - was getting OT Re: [WebAIM] More data ... (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Saturday, 11 November)
• Re: SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Assistive technologies (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: Text navigation at bottom of pages (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Sunday, 8 October)

Chris Harpin

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Thursday, 16 November)

Christopher Hoffman

• Re: New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: correct use of tfoot (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Cindy Sue Causey

• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)

Colin Lieberman

• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)

cstrobbe

• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Friday, 17 November)

Cynthia King

• FW: SMIL - IIS Server -> Flash Captioning (Thursday, 26 October)

David Poehlman

• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

David Woolley

• Re: correct use of tfoot (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Saturday, 25 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) (Monday, 6 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Sunday, 5 November)
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - Checkpoints 11.2 and 3.7 (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Friday, 6 October)

Debi Orton

• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)

Derek Featherstone

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)

Eadie, David

• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Saturday, 18 November)
• RE: Breadcrumbs (Monday, 6 November)
• Breadcrumbs (Monday, 6 November)
• Breadcrumbs (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Saturday, 21 October)

Elie Ciment

• Tag library definition (Monday, 20 November)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)

Felix Miata

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)

Frances Berriman

• RE: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) (Monday, 9 October)
• RE: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

Geoff Stephens

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Wednesday, 18 October)

George Kerscher

• FW: [accessbangla] Kofi Annan: Make the Internet available to everyone (Saturday, 25 November)

Gez Lemon

• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)

Gian Sampson-Wild

• Re: RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Sunday, 19 November)
• Re: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Thursday, 16 November)

Glenda L Sims

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 (Tuesday, 14 November)

Jackir ASSAN ALY

• SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)
• WCAG 1.0 - Checkpoints 11.2 and 3.7 (Thursday, 19 October)

Janet Russeau

• Re: Public vs. Private information (Tuesday, 21 November)

jassanaly@ipedis.com

• Subtitles with SAMI and SMIL (Friday, 6 October)

Jenny Craven

• RE: When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Friday, 17 November)

Jens Meiert

• Re: RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) (Monday, 13 November)
• Fwd: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) (Monday, 13 November)

John Colby

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Thursday, 23 November)
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)

John Foliot

• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (Saturday, 2 December)
• RE: correct use of tfoot (Friday, 1 December)
• RE: correct use of tfoot (Friday, 1 December)
• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• RE: Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• RE: @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) (Monday, 6 November)
• @role (was RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1)) (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Drop down menus (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Assistive technologies (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) (Friday, 6 October)
• Microformats & Semantic structure (was RE: Best practices for screen readers) (Friday, 6 October)
• RE: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

John Foliot - WATS.ca

• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (Monday, 4 December)
• RE: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Tuesday, 21 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• Testing screen reader configurations (was RE: examples of sites with good accessibility) (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)

John M Slatin

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)

Jon Gunderson

• New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available (Friday, 15 December)
• Open Document Format (ODF) Accessibility Testing Tool (Friday, 8 December)

Jon Ribbens

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Saturday, 7 October)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• There is a structural fault with WCAG2. That editing won’t resolve. (Friday, 1 December)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: SMIL - IIS Server (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Judy Brewer

• Call for Review: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Working Draft (Thursday, 7 December)

Julian Scarlett

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)

King, Philip

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)

Laboo

• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Saturday, 25 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Friday, 3 November)

Lois Wakeman

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes (Tuesday, 17 October)

Léonie Watson

• RE: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

Marc Faeh

• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: Microformats and Semantic structure (Part 2) (Thursday, 12 October)

Martin Stehle

• Re: Assistive technologies (Thursday, 19 October)

Matt Lee

• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)
• Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)

Matthew Smith

• Re: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Sunday, 5 November)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)

Michael Cooper

• Call for Review: WAI-ARIA Suite updated Working Drafts (Wednesday, 20 December)

Michael S Elledge

• Re: More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Thursday, 19 October)

Orion Adrian

• Re: correct use of tfoot (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Tuesday, 21 November)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [WD]: [ANN] New release of the W3C CSS Validator - Fuji (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Saturday, 11 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Saturday, 11 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)
• Re: Breadcrumbs (Monday, 6 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Tuesday, 10 October)

Patrick Lauke

• RE: SMIL - IIS Server (Thursday, 26 October)

Paul Novitski

• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)
• Re: Alternative text (Friday, 10 November)

pewtah@snafu.de

• Re: [WebAIM] More data on accesskeys (New article written Nov. 1) (Sunday, 5 November)

Phill Jenkins

• Re: There is no structural fault with WCAG2. (Friday, 1 December)
• When should I start using WCAG 2.0? (Thursday, 9 November)
• Re: Breadcrumbs (Monday, 6 November)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Wednesday, 11 October)

Ricci Angela

• [WebAIM] About anti-robot form validation (Tuesday, 7 November)

Robert Yonaitis

• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Friday, 20 October)

Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

• RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) (Monday, 13 November)
• RE: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) (Monday, 13 November)

Roel Van Gils

• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: Best practices for screen readers (Friday, 6 October)

Sebastiano.Nutarelli@csi.it

• Rif: Subtitles with SAMI and SMIL (Friday, 6 October)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• Call for Review: HTTP Vocabulary in RDF Working Draft (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: German translation of WCAG 1.0 Conformance pages (was: Re: WCAG 1.0 Conformance) (Monday, 13 November)

Shawn Henry

• WAI presentations in January 2007 (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 (Tuesday, 14 November)
• WAI IG: Web Accessibility Webcasts 14/15 November 2006 (Monday, 13 November)
• WAI IG: New WCAG 2 FAQ available (Thursday, 9 November)
• Consider supporting Web accessibility sessions for SXSW 2007 conference (Thursday, 19 October)
• Involving Users and Role of Guidelines [was Re: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0?] (Wednesday, 18 October)

Steven Faulkner

• WAT for Opera 1.1 released (Wednesday, 13 December)

Stuart Smith

• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: examples of sites with good accessibility (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 or 2.0? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Swan, Henny

• RE: [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)

Sylvie Duchateau

• European forum in Paris, January 29, 2007 (Thursday, 21 December)
• Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes (Tuesday, 17 October)

Terrence Wood

• Re: Language changes and abbreviations in alt and title attributes (Sunday, 22 October)

Tim Smithers

• [WebAIM]: a translation question ... (Wednesday, 22 November)

vivienne trulock

• Re: Public vs. Private information (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Web Dandy Design

• Incorporating Flash into a Website (Thursday, 5 October)

Yeliz Yesilada

• W4A 2007 First Call for Papers (Friday, 10 November)

Last message date: Friday, 22 December 2006 18:27:11 UTC