- From: Christopher Hoffman <christopher.a.hoffman@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 21:11:32 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <61682a40610061811g3f4c08dasbb18301a299cb023@mail.gmail.com>
> ...daily users of adaptive > technology have become accustomed to this type of "shorthand" and they get > it.... Then again, wheelchair users become accustomed to having to get into buildings through the back service entrance, and having to wait for the restaurant's assistant manager to find the keys to operate the lift. That doesn't make it right. The variety of ways in which screen readers interpret markup is strikingly similar to the disparity between the visual browsers back in the browser wars of the Nineties. Has there been much movement toward intentional standardization of screen readers, or are the existing standards mainly de facto? Finally, maybe the problem with breadcrumbs and screen readers isn't that the screen readers keep reading "greater than," "greater than, "greater than," but rather a poor choice of semantic markup. Bread crumbs are essentially a sequence of steps, which is best marked up as an ordered list. So the user would hear something like, "How you got here: one - home; two - about us; three - contact us." Chris
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2006 01:11:42 UTC