Antony Tennant wrote: > > Here are my questions:- > 1. Is the initial example accurate i.e a repeat of the thead cells > (assuming the size of the table warrants it) This is/has been my general understanding, that the <tfoot> "echoes" the <thead> so that there is <th> reference points at both the top and bottom. However, I don't think the W3C specifically *mandates* as such, and I can now think (based on the thread you quoted) that there would be no reason why the content of the <tfoot> could not be *somewhat* different. For example, if you had a long, matrix style table which tracked, say, sales by department over 12 months, then I suspect it would be appropriate to have the following: <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Month</th> <th>Dairy</th> <th>Produce</th> <th>Butcher</th> <th>Dry Goods</th> </tr> </thead> <tfoot> <tr> <th></th> <th>{total Sales figure}</th> <th>{total Sales figure}</th> <th>{total Sales figure}</th> <th>{total Sales figure}</th> </tr> </tfoot> <tbody> <tr> <th>January</th> <td>$2,500.00</td> <td>$3,500.00</td> <td>$4,500.00</td> <td>$5,500.00</td> </tr> ...etc. > 2. If there was a general footnote relating to the table data, e.g > "The charge will be refunded if the item is return undamaged" or the > footnote was relating to a specific cell or column rate e.g *free > delivery if purchased before 01/12/2006 Hmmm... I would be careful that content of the <tfoot> was not *too* disassociated with the columns and rows of your main table - I do not think it is intended to be a "footnote" style construct - it is an integral part of the overall table. > 3. Does anyone have any good real-life examples I could look at > I have used <tfoot> (along with CSS overflow on the <tbody>) on the table at: http://www.wats.ca/show.php?contentid=43 (note, the CSS overflow apparently only works in Firefox - neither IE 7 not Opera 9 seem to support it) Cheers! JFReceived on Friday, 1 December 2006 17:30:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:29 UTC