- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:32:01 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF046E2AE5.3497CB0B-ON8625720D.0054F445-8625720D.00554275@us.ibm.com>
> I focus on the term "equivalent". The alt text of "a picture" does not satisfy, even a weak definition of "equivalent", So it's not only non compliant, it is criminal. Phill, Wouldn't 508 non-compliance be a civil offense? Legally speaking, yes. I and I think others were using "criminal" loosely and not legally. The quote below is from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/report2/far.htm Section 508 uses the Federal procurement process to ensure that technology acquired by the Federal Government is accessible. Failure of an agency to purchase electronic and information technology that complies with the standards promulgated at 36 CFR part 1194, may result in an individual with a disability filing a complaint alleging that a Federal agency has not complied with the standards. Individuals may also file a civil action against an agency. The enforcement provision of section 508 takes effect June 21, 2001. Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 15:32:17 UTC