- From: <Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:03:03 -0500
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5A60A113.BD093CF6-ON8625720C.0073532C-8625720C.0073A308@kohls.com>
Hi Phill, I wasn't expecting a consensus on example of good sites on this list. I was just hoping for any examples of retail sites that are accessible. Like I said in my e-mail, I know it's a subjective question and I understand that people will disagree. I just thought it would be a better approach than randomly hitting sites and seeing if they're accessible. To that end, I also realize that companies make compromises and there is no "perfect" site. Thanks for the input, Anna Yevsiyevich Web Usability Analyst Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com> Sent by: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org 10/19/2006 03:43 PM To <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> cc Subject RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Anna, be careful in how much faith you are putting in this list. It's just that, people spending their "volunteer" time in responding. It has taken years for the WCAG 2.0 working group to reach consensus to produce working drafts. Why do you think this list could reach consensus on example good sites? When participating in some web competitions, where sites were submitted for "judging" (see note 1 Knowbility) of their accessibility compliance, even 5 experienced judges with years of experience in accessibility, many of them having been part of the original WCAG 1.0 working group (see note 2), had a hard time in reaching consensus on the particular sites being judged. The "judges" have reduced that gap by using a consistent methodology and consistent tools. And now even have a better process in understanding each judges' position on an issue and why they were different that the other judges' position. All these have reduced the differences of opinion, but there still remained some difference of opinion. This list has had none of this "maturing" process, its just an interest list. There is no working group in WAI tasked with this requirement, BUT, there is an attempt to collect best practices and document them in the techniques for WCAG (see note 3). So, if you built a commercial site out of these "best practices" example - then you would have a "good example site". good luck, Phill Jenkins IBM Worldwide Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able Note 1 Knowbility: http://www.knowbility.org/newsletter/?content=simsFall2006 Note 2 Original WCAG working Group: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixC.html Note 3 WCAG 2.0 Techniques: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of the contents of this message is expressly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately at 262-703-7000. CAUTION: Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received. Kohl's reserves the right to monitor messages to or from authorized Kohl's Associates at any time without any further consent.
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 21:03:26 UTC