- From: King, Philip <Philip.King@egg.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:16:39 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2E11AD52D50B4D42B0D80C5DC8E92D396FC7EA@PPNMBP99.uk.egg.net>
O2 website isn't bad - worked with RNIB and other 3rd parties for testing etc.... www.o2.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Smith Sent: 20 October 2006 09:44 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Hi Anna I think you are going to find it hard because in (and this is opinion yet again), accessibility just isn't on the list of a lot of retailers and web development companies. That is changing, thanks to the legislation and pressure of the more enlightened. One of the blind charities (RNIB) in the UK has a system of assessing websites called "see it right", you can see a list of companies that have been branded as such here http://www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/documents/publicwebsite/publ ic_accessiblewebsites.hcsp#P16_1606 However, please note this suggestion is not an agreement with the list on my part. Lots of the sites use tables unnecessarily and I think the endorsement of these sites encourages bad practice. But bear in mind the web is changing and some of these sites might have existed before CSS were as prevalent as they are now. Hope that (plus my caveats) give some ideas! Cheers Stu ________________________________ From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anna.Yevsiyevich@kohls.com Sent: 19 October 2006 19:15 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: examples of sites with good accessibility Based on replies to this thread, am I correct in understanding that you know of no retail site that has decent accessibility? Gap, JC Penny, Sears, KMart, WalMart, Best Buy, Circuit City, etc. None of these do anything right? Is there at least ONE retail site that can be viewed as "OK" in terms of accessibility. I know it is a subjective question, and depends on the intended audience of the site, as well as all the other considerations discussed in earlier posts. Anna Yevsiyevich Web Usability Analyst ----------------------------------------- Egg is a trading name of the Egg group of companies which includes: Egg plc (reg no 2448340), Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd (reg no 3828289), and Egg Banking plc (reg no 2999842). Egg Banking plc and Egg Financial Intermediation Ltd are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and are entered in the FSA register under numbers 205621 and 309551 respectively. These members of the Egg group are registered in England and Wales. Registered office: 1 Waterhouse Square, 138- 142 Holborn, London EC1N 2NA. This e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete it from your mailbox. Internet e- mails are not necessarily secure. The Egg group of companies do not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by the Egg group of companies in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. This communication does not create or modify any contract.
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 11:16:15 UTC