Saturday, 30 June 2012
- Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- [Bug 17661] I would like to try this input box. Thanks
- [Bug 17661] New: I would like to try this input box. Thanks
- [Bug 17657] New: Empty arrays shouldn't be valid KeyPaths
- Re: [IndexedDB] Extracting keys and null/undefined
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
Friday, 29 June 2012
- RE: publish new WD of File API; deadline July 3
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- [Bug 17656] New: Rewrite Blob constructor algorithm
- Re: WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- Re: WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- Re: WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- Re: WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- WebIDL overload resolution, arrays and Nullable
- [Bug 17653] <!doctype html> <html lang="ja"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>撮影依頼 - ちくせいロケーションサービス「ちくロケ!」</title> <meta name="description" content="下記に必要事項をご記入のうえ、送信してください。お探しのイメージを出来るだけ詳細..." /> <meta name="keywords" content="撮影依頼,ロケ地,撮影,田園地帯, 学校撮影,=?UTF-8?
- [Bug 17653] New: <!doctype html> <html lang="ja"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>撮影依頼 - ちくせいロケーションサービス「ちくロケ!」</title> <meta name="description" content="下記に必要事項をご記入のうえ、送信してください。お探しのイメージを出来るだけ詳細..." /> <meta name="keywords" content="撮影依頼,ロケ地,撮影,田園地帯, 学校撮影,=?U
- [Bug 17652] New: Blob constructor: the blobParts array should probably not have nullable elements
- Re: [IndexedDB] Exception inconsistency
- [Bug 17650] New: Make createIndex throw InvalidAccessError instead of NotSupportedError
- [Bug 17649] New: Address WebIDL comments from Kyle Huey
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- [Bug 17644] OK I spent hours all over the web and your docs getting to grips with websocket, my question now is this.... in the the handshake....how does one actually implement the header for the websocket? there is not explanation of this anywhere... how is the head
- Re: [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline June 28
- Re: [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline June 28
- [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline July 9
- [Bug 17645] New: Define more precisely what the "origin" of the IDBEnvironment is
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21
Thursday, 28 June 2012
- [Bug 17644] New: OK I spent hours all over the web and your docs getting to grips with websocket, my question now is this.... in the the handshake....how does one actually implement the header for the websocket? there is not explanation of this anywhere... how is the head
- [Bug 17643] New: What should transaction.error be set to if a error handler throws an exception
- Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
- RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
- [Bug 16952] Add a Blob.close()
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of File API; deadline July 3
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- [Bug 17609] New: [IndexedDB] Events fired after transaction abort should not set active flag
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [Bug 16726] Remove quotes in "transparent" and "native" values
- CfC: publish new WD of File API; deadline July 3
- [Bug 17125] Add a FileList.drop(index) method
- [Bug 17125] Add a FileList.drop(index) method
- Re: [IndexedDB] Null argument for optionalParameters?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Null argument for optionalParameters?
- [IndexedDB] Null argument for optionalParameters?
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: CfC: publish a LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline June 25
- Re: CfC: publish WD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline June 25
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
Monday, 25 June 2012
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- [Bug 16292] conflation of DOMString and deflated DOMString
Saturday, 23 June 2012
Friday, 22 June 2012
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21
- Fwd: TPAC 2012 Registration
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Shadown DOM and Regions CSSOM
- Re: [IME] WebIDL bugs
Thursday, 21 June 2012
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Web Intent work scope
- Re: [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline June 28
- RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Selectors API Implementation Report
- Re: Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents
- Selectors API Implementation Report
- Re: Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- [websockets] Seeking comments on moving back to CR; deadline June 28
- Re: Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- [Shadow DOM] Shadown DOM and Regions CSSOM
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
Wednesday, 20 June 2012
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Web Notifications
- Re: Web Notifications
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Re: Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Tags and origins (was: Re: Web Notifications)
- Re: CfC: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Re: Web Notifications
- Re: Web Notifications
- Web Notifications
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Origins and document.domain
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- [IndexedDB] Extracting keys and null/undefined
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Origins and document.domain
- [IndexedDB] Origins and document.domain
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: CfC: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Fwd: IndieUI Call For Proposals
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish a LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline June 25
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
Monday, 18 June 2012
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- [Bug 17538] New: [IndexedDB] Remove error clauses for invalid index keys
- RE: publish WD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline June 25
- RE: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- CfC: publish a LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline June 25
- CfC: publish WD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline June 25
- Re: Updates to Selectors API
- Re: Updates to Selectors API
- Re: Updates to Selectors API
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
Sunday, 17 June 2012
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- [selectors-api] NAMESPACE_ERR or SYNTAX_ERR when both applied
- Re: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: Browser Payments API proposal
Saturday, 16 June 2012
- Browser Payments API proposal
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
Friday, 15 June 2012
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- Re: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
Thursday, 14 June 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Updates to Selectors API
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21
- Updates to Selectors API
- [Bug 17485] Whatsapp application can not connect to server
- [Bug 17486] Whatsapp application can not connect to server
- [Bug 17486] New: Whatsapp application can not connect to server
- [Bug 17485] New: Whatsapp application can not connect to server
- Re: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
- [Bug 14569] URL object should not return DOMTokenList
- Re: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- [Bug 17449] It is unclear to set type to be lower case in Blob constructor.
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
- RE: www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- www-dom vs public-webapps WAS: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents
- Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- [Bug 17467] Established in 2003, http://www.fashionskateshoes.com, was born out of the streets desire for urban biased fashion. When SUPRA,NIKE NEW BALANCE,GUCCI were causing waves in the early 2000's the fashion of hip hop and urban shoes came to the fore in a big w
- [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- Re: [DOM4] Mutation algorithm imposed order on document children
- [Bug 17467] New: Established in 2003, http://www.fashionskateshoes.com, was born out of the streets desire for urban biased fashion. When SUPRA,NIKE NEW BALANCE,GUCCI were causing waves in the early 2000's the fashion of hip hop and urban shoes came to the fore in a big w
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
Monday, 11 June 2012
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
Monday, 11 June 2012
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits
- Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits
- Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits
Saturday, 9 June 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Key paths need to be specified better
- [Bug 17449] New: It is unclear to set type to be lower case in Blob constructor.
Friday, 8 June 2012
- [QUOTA] Misleading example in Quota handling in storage API section
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [IndexedDB] Key paths need to be specified better
- Re: [IndexedDB] Key paths need to be specified better
- [IndexedDB] Key paths need to be specified better
Thursday, 7 June 2012
Friday, 8 June 2012
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
Thursday, 7 June 2012
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [Bug 16557] Figure out bytes to code point mapping for statusText
- [Bug 17437] Doc/mim70$slowac speed x 20(x20)mack test3.Gophertext.Rouder don't it Id!
- [Bug 17437] New: Doc/mim70$slowac speed x 20(x20)mack test3.Gophertext.Rouder don't it Id!
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline June 14
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Quota Management API; deadline June 13
- [Process] Publishing use cases and requirements as official docs
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- CfC: publish FPWD of Quota Management API; deadline June 13
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- RE: [IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- [Bug 17321] Implementors should be aware that this specification is not stable. Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this spe
- [Bug 17321] New: Implementors should be aware that this specification is not stable. Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this spe
- Re: [IME] WebIDL bugs
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
Monday, 4 June 2012
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [whatwg] Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- [Bug 17307] Investigate if double[] should be used for axes and buttons
- [Bug 17308] Gamepad.id should be DOMString, not string
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- [Bug 17311] New: The dictionary for GamepadEvent's ctor isn't defined
- [Bug 17310] New: The target of gamepad(dis)connected events is not defined
- [Bug 17309] New: It is not defined what the value of Gamepad.index should be after disconnecting the gamepad
- [Bug 17308] New: Gamepad.id should be DOMString, not string
- [Bug 17307] New: Investigate if double[] should be used for axes and buttons
- [Bug 17306] New: The initial value of timestamp is not defined
Sunday, 3 June 2012
Monday, 4 June 2012
- Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: May 2012 updates
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- [Bug 17262] send function should have async interface
- Re: [IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft
- [Bug 17303] New: Fix editorial issues from Tobie
- [IME] WebIDL bugs
Sunday, 3 June 2012
- [Bug 17300] the title of the section
- [Bug 17299] the title of the section
- [Bug 17300] New: the title of the section
- [Bug 17299] New: the title of the section
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
Saturday, 2 June 2012
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
Friday, 1 June 2012
- RE: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Fullscreen events dispatched to elements
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- RE: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- [Bug 17262] send function should have async interface
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- [Bug 17277] [FileAPI] It have no clear behavior about negative index of FileList.item
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- [Bug 17277] New: [FileAPI] It have no clear behavior about negative index of FileList.item
Thursday, 31 May 2012
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- [Bug 17276] New: Step 8 in versionchange transaction algorithm is wrong.
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- RE: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: [File API] Blob URI creation
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- RE: Is Quota Management API ready for First Public Working Draft?
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- [Bug 17258] can range object support text/word/sentence based range setting?
- [Bug 17266] You don't have permission to access /trouves on this server.
- [Bug 17266] New: You don't have permission to access /trouves on this server.
- [Bug 17264] New: Add attributes to use ping/pong frames effectively
- [Bug 17263] New: Keep on having send(ArrayBuffer data) interface in addition to send(ArrayBufferView data)
- [Bug 17262] New: send function should have async interface
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
- Re: [File API] Blob URI creation
- [Bug 17253] New: IDL typo
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: [File API] Blob URI creation
- [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- [IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft
- Re: [File API] Blob URI creation
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- [File API] Blob URI creation
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- [gamepad] events and misc.
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- RE: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- [Bug 17242] New: Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
- RE: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- [Bug 17241] New: Editing API spec needs to be aware of PRE contents
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
Tuesday, 29 May 2012
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- Re: IndexedDB: use of TypeError
- RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- CfC: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- IndexedDB: use of TypeError
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: IndexedDB: ambiguity around IDBTransaction.error
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- [Bug 17236] New: Ambiguity in IDBTransaction.error around 'done' state
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- [admin] Mail List Policy, Usage, Etiquette, etc. & Top-posting
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Is Quota Management API ready for First Public Working Draft?
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM 3 Events; deadline June 4
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: IndexedDB: ambiguity around IDBTransaction.error
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
Monday, 28 May 2012
- [Bug 17224] New: Possible typo in section 6: Ping and Pong Frames
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [Bug 17222] New: treat status code 308 consistently with 301, 302, and 307
- CfC: publish WD of DOM 3 Events; deadline June 4
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
Sunday, 27 May 2012
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- RE: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- RE: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
Saturday, 26 May 2012
- Re: [manifest] Parsing origins, was Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] asynchronous calls, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] Parsing origins, was Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] asynchronous calls, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] features Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: [manifest] Parsing origins, was Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
Friday, 25 May 2012
Saturday, 26 May 2012
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- Re: [manifest] Parsing origins, was Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- RE: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
Friday, 25 May 2012
- Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- [Bug 17198] New: Remove mention of IDBVersionChangeRequest
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- [Bug 17196] (Note: Your IP address and user agent will be publicly recorded for spam prevention purposes.)
- [Bug 17196] New: (Note: Your IP address and user agent will be publicly recorded for spam prevention purposes.)
- RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [Bug 17192] Trying to find the music i downloaded
- [Bug 17192] New: Trying to find the music i downloaded
- Re: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- RE: [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [manifest] asynchronous calls, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [manifest] features Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [manifest] screen sizes, Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [manifest] Parsing origins, was Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- [Bug 17184] Please don't use section numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand.
- [Bug 17184] New: Please don't use section numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand.
- Re: Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Proposal: Document.parse() [AKA: Implied Context Parsing]
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
Thursday, 24 May 2012
- Re: RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline June 14
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-url-20120524
- RfC: LCWD of WebSocket API; deadline June 14
- RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 21
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Non-persistent in-memory storage accessible by same domain tabs
- Non-persistent in-memory storage accessible by same domain tabs
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- RE: Push API draft uploaded
- Re: URL spec parameter-related methods use "parameter" in a way inconsistent with the URI RFC
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: URL spec parameter-related methods use "parameter" in a way inconsistent with the URI RFC
- URL spec parameter-related methods use "parameter" in a way inconsistent with the URI RFC
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Push API draft uploaded
- Push API draft uploaded
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: [fullscreen] fullscreenEnabled and the fullscreen enabled flag
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- RE: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions
- Re: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions
- Re: DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions
- DOMParser Errors Should Be Exceptions
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- Re: Howto spec
- New list: System Applications
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Howto spec
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Widget Interface is W3C Proposed Recommendation'
- [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Widget Interface is W3C Proposed Recommendation'
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
- [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Widget Interface is W3C Proposed Recommendation'
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: IndexedDB: Binary Keys
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: IndexedDB: Binary Keys
- Re: [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: IndexedDB: Binary Keys
Monday, 21 May 2012
- [File API] File behavior under modification
- Re: IndexedDB: Binary Keys
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- IndexedDB: Binary Keys
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
- Re: Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
Sunday, 20 May 2012
Saturday, 19 May 2012
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
Thursday, 17 May 2012
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Proposal: add websocket close codes for "server not found" and/or "too many websockets open"
Saturday, 19 May 2012
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
Friday, 18 May 2012
- Re: [fullscreen] fullscreenEnabled and the fullscreen enabled flag
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Comments, Spec Bugs and Test Case are Always Welcome! [Was: Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal]
- Spec Bugs and Test Suites [Was: Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal]
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
Thursday, 17 May 2012
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- [fullscreen] fullscreenEnabled and the fullscreen enabled flag
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Shrinking existing libraries as a goal
- [Bug 17073] New: Dygear@gmail.com - Mark 'Dygear' Tomlin With the View Data Specification gaining maturity, I wanted to add something to it that I feel would make a huge impact on the power of Binary Data and Web Sockets. I was hoping that someone with quite a lot more kn
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
- Re: Working with FormData as an object
- RE: New tests submitted by Microsoft for WebApps specs
- Re: WebApps May F2F Minutes
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- WebApps May F2F Minutes
- Feedback on Quota Management API
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
Monday, 14 May 2012
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: XHR's setRequestHeader and the Do Not Track (DNT) header
- [Bug 15494] Should Content-Transfer-Encoding be forbidden?
- [Bug 17046] New: Implement redirect audit functionality for XHR
- Re: Working with FormData as an object
- Re: Working with FormData as an object
- [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface
Sunday, 13 May 2012
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- [Bug 17042] Last-Event-ID is not a simple header
- [Bug 17042] New: Last-Event-ID is not a simple header
- RE: App Manifest & API Proposal
- RE: App Manifest & API Proposal
Saturday, 12 May 2012
- Review of Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- Re: App Manifest & API Proposal
- App Manifest & API Proposal
Friday, 11 May 2012
- Re: File constructor
- Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out
- Re: File constructor
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: History Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: File constructor
- Re: History Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: File constructor
- Media File System API
- [admin] New wiki about Spec Editing
- [Bug 10894] [pending URL spec] Reflecting an IDL attribute with a URL should try to canonicalize whatever value is set
- [Bug 15765] Replaceable interface
- [Bug 15254] Don't forbid underscore in host names in URLs
- [Bug 14210] Reflecting href with a URL that doesn't resolve doesn't return the empty string in browsers (at least opera/moz, don't know what URL would fail to resolve in webkit). Instead it returns the value without resolving.
- [Bug 14832] Check whether the encoding problems for query components applies to mailto: URLs and other non-HTTP URLs and see if we can change the definition of "valid URL" accordingly
- [Bug 15684] [URL] Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat
- [Bug 11379] [pending URL spec] definition of hierarchical URL inconsistent with rfc 3986
- [Bug 15718] Need to decide if URLs can ever fail to parse
- [Bug 11587] [pending URL spec] window.location.hostname should remove brackets of IPv6 host
- File constructor
- CfC: publish LCWD of Web Sockets; deadline May 18
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- History Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: Working with FormData as an object [Was: Request for FormData.remove() method]
- Working with FormData as an object [Was: Request for FormData.remove() method]
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
Thursday, 10 May 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- [Bug 17032] New: IndexedDB: Editorial - use of phrase "explicit key" is confusing
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline May 17
- Re: [webcomponents] Use x:: instead of x-?
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
Thursday, 10 May 2012
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
Thursday, 10 May 2012
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- [Bug 16999] Clarify JS type for empty close reason
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- [webcomponents] Use x:: instead of x-?
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [admin] short-names and 1-liners for our 7 new FPWDs
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [admin] short-names and 1-liners for our 7 new FPWDs
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- RE: CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 15
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Re: Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
- Adding a paint event to HTMLElement to support Web Components / Shadow DOM
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
- Re: [EventSource] Question on event type
- Re: [EventSource] Is the field name "event" supported in current browsers?
- Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- [Bug 16999] New: Clarify JS type for empty close reason
- Re: [admin] short-names and 1-liners for our 7 new FPWDs
- [admin] short-names and 1-liners for our 7 new FPWDs
- Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting
- Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting
- Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting
- Draft Minutes: 2 May 2012 f2f meeting
- Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 15
- RfC: 2 LCWDs "Performance Timeline" and "User Timing"; deadline June 7
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 15
- [Bug 14404] Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
Monday, 7 May 2012
- [Bug 16950] Throw SyntaxError instead of InvalidStateError for invalid content-type
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- [Bug 16953] New: createObjectURL and oneTimeOnly behavior should be defined in terms of stable state
- [Bug 16952] New: Add a Blob.close()
- [Bug 16950] New: Throw SyntaxError instead of InvalidStateError for invalid content-type
- [Bug 16749] Remove note about old slice
- [Bug 16746] Syntax check 'type' in Blob constructor
- [Bug 16732] Use ArrayBufferView instead of ArrayBuffer in Blob constructor
- [Bug 16731] Define when "native" ending conversion happens
- [Bug 16729] Make endings an enum
- [Bug 16728] Blob.type
- [Bug 16727] Remove "If an invalid key is used or if the dictionary argument is invalid, user agents MUST throw an InvalidStateError."
- [Bug 16724] Blob without arguments underdefined
- [Bug 16723] Bogus requirement in Blob constructor
- [Bug 16722] Add references to bugzilla from the spec
- [Bug 16721] Blob constructor with wrong args
- RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Shadow DOM; deadline May 9
Sunday, 6 May 2012
- Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- Re: CfC: publish a FPWD of Web Components Explainer; deadline May 9
- Re: New tests submitted by Microsoft for WebApps specs
Saturday, 5 May 2012
- RE: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
Friday, 4 May 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- RE: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Typo in NotReadableError defintion?
- Re: CfC: publish a FPWD of Web Components Explainer; deadline May 9
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- [Bug 16930] I don't like public data
- [Bug 16931] In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16932] In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16934] In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16933] In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- [Bug 16933] New: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16934] New: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16932] New: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16931] New: In a good manner, sir/madaam, i am very disapointed that for how many months always asking my self what can i do my computer, and how to fixed it, shortly im not expert of computer.. my technician and my freind partners in crime.. my account was hacked si
- [Bug 16930] New: I don't like public data
- [Bug 16927] New: HTML reference was changed from W3C version to WHATWG version
- Inking out a PenObserver, was Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
Thursday, 3 May 2012
- [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- RE: [admin] A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Requirements
- Re: [admin] A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Requirements
- [admin] A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Requirements
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- [IndexedDB] Bug 14404: What happens when a versionchange transaction is aborted?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- Re: [editing] input event should have a data property WAS: [D3E] Where did textInput go?
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- CfC: publish FPWD of URL spec; deadline May 9
- CfC: publish FPWD of Screen Orientation ; deadline May 9
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- CfC: publish FPWD of Input Method Editor (IME); deadline May 9
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: CfC: publish a FPWD of Web Components Explainer; deadline May 9
- Re: GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- GamepadObserver (ie. MutationObserver + Gamepad)
- Re: [editing] input event should have a data property WAS: [D3E] Where did textInput go?
- [Bug 16715] IndexedDB: Spec nit in steps for evaluating key path
- [Bug 16465] [IndexedDB] Error handling of db.transaction('mystore', 'some invalid value here') should be defined
- Re: [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- [IndexedDB] Checked in fix for ReSpec issue
- Re: CfC: publish a FPWD of Web Components Explainer; deadline May 9
- CfC: publish a FPWD of Web Components Explainer; deadline May 9
- CfC: publish FPWD of Shadow DOM; deadline May 9
- [Bug 16708] s/ArrayBuffer/ArrayBufferView/ - See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0177.html
- CfC: publish FPWD of Pointer Lock spec; deadline May 9
- CfC: publish FPWD of Gamepad spec; deadline May 9
- [Bug 16703] I am suggesting a default value for the "code" argument to the close method. I am currently experimenting with this method and noticed that Chrome and Firefox seem to use different default values. If I do not specify a code, Chrome appears to use 1005 (
- [Bug 16157] WebSocket shouldn't throw SyntaxError on unpaired surrogates
- [Bug 15400] WebSocket Protocol reference needs updating
- [Bug 16134] This spec should point out how to actually receive data. Afaik you need to access the message event's data property, but the spec doesn't mention that anywhere.
- [Bug 15595] The abstract could be improved by pointing out that "WebSocket protocol" is defined by the IETF, while this API specifies the browser API to use that protocol. "The send(data) method transmits data using the connection. If the readyState attribute is CONN
- [Bug 16714] IndexedDB: creating an object store with Array-type key path and key generator should be forbidden
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- CfC: to stop work on From-Origin spec; deadline May 8
- ReSpec biblio
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- CfC: to stop work on XBL2; deadline May 8
- Re: CORS: joint meeting of WebApps and WebAppSec next week?
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- [webcomponents] Custom Elements Spec
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Clipboard API spec should specify beforecopy, beforecut, and beforepaste events
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Call for Implementations: HTML5 Web Messaging Candidate Recommendation
- Call for Implementations: Web Workers Candidate Recommendation
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- [Bug 16894] New: Provide a high-level summary with examples
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
Monday, 30 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Sunday, 29 April 2012
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- [Server-Sent Events] Network connection clarification
- [Bug 16883] New: Consider supporting some commands in plaintext editors
Saturday, 28 April 2012
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: What about a new WebApps Developer's list? [Was: Re: CORS in Google App Engine]
- What about a new WebApps Developer's list? [Was: Re: CORS in Google App Engine]
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
Friday, 27 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: WebApps' new charter has been approved
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [whatwg] [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- Re: WebApps' new charter has been approved
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- WebApps' new charter has been approved
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- Re: CORS in Google App Engine
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Friday, 27 April 2012
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
Thursday, 26 April 2012
- [Bug 14086] When performing AJAX type queries, they are already asynchronous and already occur in another thread. However, I have found that parsing the XML reply and converting that to a representation usable by the javascript application can result in freezes to t
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Web Intents on WebApps' May 1-2 f2f meeting agenda?
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [XHR] Authentication prompt during send()
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- RE: [XHR] Authentication prompt during send()
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; deadline May 2
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- RfC: LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline May 17
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- [Bug 16866] EOF is no longer valid as newline so "and the end of the file being the four ways in which a line can end" should be removed.
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- Re: [XHR] Authentication prompt during send()
- Re: CORS: joint meeting of WebApps and WebAppSec next week?
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Widget Updates; deadline April 19
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- CORS: joint meeting of WebApps and WebAppSec next week?
- Reminder: Comment deadline for CORS Last Call Working Draft is May 1
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- [Bug 16846] cześc to ja rodzyn i wydaje mi się ze jestem na dość dobrej pozycji i w ogóle jestem super i jestem zajebisty ale nie czaje o co chodzi ty wszystklim ludzą skoro to ma tak wyglądać no to wydaje mi się że to będzie już koniec co wyu na no to ;;;
Tuesday, 24 April 2012
- RE: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [Bug 16846] New: cześc to ja rodzyn i wydaje mi się ze jestem na dość dobrej pozycji i w ogóle jestem super i jestem zajebisty ale nie czaje o co chodzi ty wszystklim ludzą skoro to ma tak wyglądać no to wydaje mi się że to będzie już koniec co wyu na no to ;;;
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- RE: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [DOM3 Events/DOM4] re-dispatching trusted events with initEvent
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [Bug 16840] i vear shiad but lagbar mypassword
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [Bug 16840] New: i vear shiad but lagbar mypassword
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- [Bug 16833] New: consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
- Re: [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [webcomponents] Template element parser changes => Proposal for adding DocumentFragment.innerHTML
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
Monday, 23 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Custom Tags and Local Semantics
- Custom Tags and Local Semantics
- RE: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline April 23
- RE: publish Proposed Recommendation of Widget Interface; deadline April 26
Sunday, 22 April 2012
- Re: [EventSource] Make it available in Worker
- Re: [EventSource] Make it available in Worker
- Re: [EventSource] Make it available in Worker
- [EventSource] Make it available in Worker
Thursday, 19 April 2012
- Re: [CORS] Applying preflight cache to an entire domain?
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Widget Interface; deadline April 26
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
- [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Proposed Recommendation
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [CORS] Applying preflight cache to an entire domain?
- Re: [CORS] Applying preflight cache to an entire domain?
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [CORS] Applying preflight cache to an entire domain?
- Re: Request for FormData.remove() method
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
- [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- Re: IndexedDB: Retrieving A Slice Of A Record Value.
- Re: IndexedDB: Retrieving a slice of a record value.
- IndexedDB: Retrieving a slice of a record value.
Monday, 16 April 2012
- Re: Reminder: May 1-2 f2f meeting: registration deadline is April 16
- [Bug 16749] New: Remove note about old slice
- Re: Reminder: May 1-2 f2f meeting: registration deadline is April 16
- Reminder: May 1-2 f2f meeting: registration deadline is April 16
- CfC: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline April 23
- [Bug 16746] New: Syntax check 'type' in Blob constructor
Friday, 13 April 2012
- Re: Delay in File * spec publications in /TR/ [Was: CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline March 3]
- [Bug 16733] New: Drop 'endings'?
- [Bug 16732] New: Use ArrayBufferView instead of ArrayBuffer in Blob constructor
- [Bug 16731] New: Define when "native" ending conversion happens
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- [Bug 16730] New: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- [Bug 16729] New: Make endings an enum
- [Bug 16728] New: Blob.type
- [Bug 16727] New: Remove "If an invalid key is used or if the dictionary argument is invalid, user agents MUST throw an InvalidStateError."
- [Bug 16726] New: Remove quotes in "transparent" and "native" values
- [Bug 16724] New: Blob without arguments underdefined
- [Bug 16723] New: Bogus requirement in Blob constructor
- [Bug 16722] New: Add references to bugzilla from the spec
- [Bug 16721] New: Blob constructor with wrong args
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
Thursday, 12 April 2012
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- BlobBuilder.append() should take ArrayBufferView in addition to ArrayBuffer
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- [Bug 16715] New: IndexedDB: Spec nit in steps for evaluating key path
- [Bug 16714] New: IndexedDB: creating an object store with Array-type key path and key generator should be forbidden
- Re: IndexedDB: Key generators (autoIncrement) and Array-type key paths
- IndexedDB user's feedback
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Widget Updates; deadline April 19
- Re: Speech API: first editor's draft posted
- Speech API: first editor's draft posted
- [Bug 16708] s/ArrayBuffer/ArrayBufferView/ - See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0177.html
- [Bug 16303] meaning of "all" charset parameters of content-type header
- Re: [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- [Bug 16303] meaning of "all" charset parameters of content-type header
- Re: [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- Re: [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- [Bug 16707] New: user/password set to undefined means missing
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- [Bug 16303] meaning of "all" charset parameters of content-type header
- Re: IndexedDB: Key generators (autoIncrement) and Array-type key paths
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
- IndexedDB: Key generators (autoIncrement) and Array-type key paths
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- [Bug 16703] New: I am suggesting a default value for the "code" argument to the close method. I am currently experimenting with this method and noticed that Chrome and Firefox seem to use different default values. If I do not specify a code, Chrome appears to use 1005 (
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Reminder: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: Web Intents on WebApps' May 1-2 f2f meeting agenda?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Should send() be able to take an ArrayBufferView?
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- Re: [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- [XHR2] undefined as user/password arguments
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: Reminder: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: Web Intents on WebApps' May 1-2 f2f meeting agenda?
- Re: Draft report for offline apps workshop
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- [XHR] XMLHttpRequest.send("")
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Re: Exceptions for DOM-XPath
- [DOM4] Question about collections versus maps
- Exceptions for DOM-XPath
- Re: informal survey - on spec philosophy
- Re: Web Intents on WebApps' May 1-2 f2f meeting agenda?
- RE: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Delay in File * spec publications in /TR/ [Was: CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline March 3]
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- New public mailing list for discussions on potential NFC work at W3C
- Re: Reminder: May 1-2 f2f meeting: registration deadline is April 16
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Web Intents on WebApps' May 1-2 f2f meeting agenda?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
Monday, 9 April 2012
- Re: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- RE: File API "oneTimeOnly" is too poorly defined
- RE: [IndexedDB] Full text search?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Full text search?
- [Bug 16665] kk gd df d fgd f gd gdg
- [Bug 16665] New: kk gd df d fgd f gd gdg
- Reminder: May 1-2 f2f meeting: registration deadline is April 16
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
Sunday, 8 April 2012
Saturday, 7 April 2012
Friday, 6 April 2012
- Re: Draft report for offline apps workshop
- [Bug 16653] New: IndexedDB: Define overloads for IDBDatabase.transaction()
- Draft report for offline apps workshop
Thursday, 5 April 2012
- [Bug 8406] Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions
- [Bug 16451] Clarify the order of the documents
- [Bug 16449] requestFullScreen() terminates at the wrong place
- Re: [editing] input event should have a data property WAS: [D3E] Where did textInput go?
- Fwd: ACTION-623: Notify TAG when a Last Call Working Draft of CORS or UMP is published (Web Applications Working Group)
- [Bug 16639] tr hrt hrt rth rt trr tr rt
- [Bug 16639] New: tr hrt hrt rth rt trr tr rt
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: CfC: Add warnings to old DOM specifications; deadline April 18
- Re: CfC: Add warnings to old DOM specifications; deadline April 18
- Re: CfC: Add warnings to old DOM specifications; deadline April 18
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- [editing] input event should have a data property WAS: [D3E] Where did textInput go?
- Re: Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- Re: publish Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 11
- Re: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Workers; deadline April 11
- RE: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Workers; deadline April 11
- RE: publish Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 11
- Shared workers - use .source instead of .ports[0] ?
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline April 11
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Workers; deadline April 11
- CfC: Add warnings to old DOM specifications; deadline April 18
- Re: Warnings for old DOM specifications
- Warnings for old DOM specifications
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Workshop IHM
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
- RE: [Clipboard] Mathematical Proofs in HTML5 Documents
- RE: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- RE: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- RE: Speech API Community Group
- Re: Speech API Community Group
- TransAnn: CORS published as Last Call Working Draft
- RE: Speech API Community Group
- Speech API Community Group
- Re: [Clipboard] Mathematical Proofs in HTML5 Documents
- FYI: Speech API Community Group Proposed
- [Clipboard] Mathematical Proofs in HTML5 Documents
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
Monday, 2 April 2012
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- [Bug 16469] storage event for clear() is defined to have |key| set to null, but |key| is not nullable
- Reminder: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined
- FYI: Web Application Store Community Group Launched
Sunday, 1 April 2012
- Re: Suggestions for IDBKeyRange, IDBEnvironment and IDBFactory
- [Bug 16596] New: Clarify how upgradeneeded works in the .open function
- [Bug 16595] Ability to get non-sequential records from various operations
- [Bug 16595] New: Ability to get non-sequential records from various operations
- [Bug 16594] .isTrusted should probably be false on Editing(Before)InputEvent
- [Bug 16594] New: .isTrusted should probably be false on Editing(Before)InputEvent
- Suggestions for IDBKeyRange, IDBEnvironment and IDBFactory
- RE: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined