On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 16:14, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 16:11, Glenn Adams wrote: > > > > > > in that case, please record an objection on my part > > > just to be clear, I mean an objection to publishing as PR unless this > is clarified; i believe this is an issue because the concept and use of > origin is (1) very complex and (2) thus prone to misinterpretation; for > example, it is not well recognized that HTML5 itself does not require a UA > to send an Origin header in a URL request (see [3]) > > Yes, but those are issue of RFC6454 and the HTML5 spec (as well as Web > Storage). But what does this have to do with Widgets? > > Glenn and I discussed this on IRC. Glenn suggested I add the following to > the definition of a widget instance: > > "The origin of a widget instance is the origin of the Document object > associated with the widget instance's browsing context." > > I agree with Glenns recommendation, so I've go ahead and added that: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#widget-instance thanks Marcos, I drop my objection; regarding the reference to HTML5, it would be an improvement if you could change section 6.5 from: The concept of origin is defined in [HTML]<http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#html5> . to The concept of origin of a Document object is defined in [HTML]<http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#html5> .
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 15:57:58 UTC