W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

[IndexedDB] Normative content arguably informative in IndexedDB LC draft

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:17:10 +0000
To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CBEC22B4.83D9D%tobie@fb.com>

Section 6 (Privacy) and 7 (Authorization) of the IndexedDB LC draft[1]
feel very informative, yet they're not marked as such.

Is there ground to keep them as normative content or should we explicitly
mark them as non-normative, remove their usage of the RFC 2119 MAY
keyword, and mark the linked references ([COOKIES]) as informative?



[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-IndexedDB-20120524/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 17:17:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC