Re: [webcomponents] HTML Parsing and the <template> element

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Scott González
<scott.gonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, the fact that they both work with <script> is why I didn't list them.
> If it weren't for #2, I would suspect that there wouldn't be any proposal
> for <template> other than solving the </script> problem. As much as <script
> type="text/whatever"> is a hack, it's really pretty clean. I could be wrong,
> but I don't think there is any group of developers who are actually upset
> about the semantics of using <script>.
>

+1.  It's really about those couple of issues in my mind.   Even the
inability to write script tags doesn't exactly make me cry, but I can
see the usefulness of it...

Is it just Scott and I who are totally outside a larger consensus on this?

Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 22:08:50 UTC