On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:26:04 +0200, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > IE10 does not implement SharedWorkers at the present time. We also don’t > yet implement the updated "Transferrable" notion for MessagePorts in the > structured clone algorithm. Ah, OK. > We do ship Workers now, and so my primary concern is that the spec > doesn't remove the "ports" property of the MessageEvent. Yep, I'm not suggesting to remove it. > I don't mind the proposal to re-use .source of MessageEvent for a > "connect" event on a SharedWorker. I think it's a bit ugly to swap the > "WindowProxy" type of .source to "any" just for this case. Anne said the type could be (WindowProxy or MessagePort)?. > I am curious to see where this latest discussion on perhaps using a > different Event interface for "connect" events will lead... -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 05:12:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:33 UTC