- From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 02:31:01 +0000
- To: "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Arthur Barstow (art.barstow@nokia.com)" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
We approve too! Israel On Tuesday, May 08, 2012 9:45 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > I approve!! > > / Jonas > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> > wrote: > > As discussed during last week's f2f meeting [Mins], IDB bug 14404 was > > the last remaining bug blocking a LCWD of the spec and the other > > remaining bugs are considered editorial and not blockers for LCWD > > [Bugz]. Bug 1404 is now closed so this is a Call for Consensus to > > publish a LCWD of IDB using the following ED as the basis > > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> (it has > > not yet been made "TR pub ready"). > > > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's > > decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process > > Document states the following regarding the significance/meaning of a LCWD: > > > > [[ > > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > > > > Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: > > > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant > > technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) > > in the Working Draft; > > > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant > > dependencies with other groups; > > > > * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these > > dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement > > is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the > > technical report to later maturity levels. > > ]] > > > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them > > to public-webapps@w3.org by May 15 at the latest. Positive response is > > preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement > > with the proposal. > > > > The proposed LC review period is 4 weeks. > > > > -Thanks, AB > > > > [Mins] http://www.w3.org/2012/05/02-webapps-minutes.html#item10 > > [Bugz] http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-IndexedDB > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 02:31:35 UTC