On Thu, 10 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> >> Still, requiring an explicit context declaration *at all* defeats
> >> most of the purpose of the API. Again, if we don't auto-detect SVG
> >> (so that "<rect>" just parses as HTMLUnknownElement by default), we
> >> haven't gained much, since authors will *still* have to wrap their
> >> code in a regex-based detector if they expect to ever use SVG. (An
> >> optional context declaration that lets you determine which way the
> >> tagname conflicts go is fine, of course.)
> >
> > Can you elaborate on the use case for parsing markup into a document
> > fragment when you don't know where you'll be putting the document
> > fragment or what kind of content is in it?
>
> That's pretty much exactly the description of the jQuery $("[markup goes
> here]") functionality, which has been cited multiple times as the
> justification for this functionality. A previous thread about this
> functionality was started by Yehuda Katz from jQuery about that exact
> function, asking for this functionality.
Yes, I understand that. But what's the use case?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'