- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:30:25 +0200
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote: > Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition > between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not just > decide which tool to use? It's a tradeoff: ReSpec.js pro: * No setup costs ReSpec.js con: * Loads slower because of script. You get a flash of unstyled content. User experience suffers. * Legacy DOM-style of defining methods/attributes appears to be the default. Anolis pro: * Cross-specification cross-references Anolis con: * Harder (requires Python) In the end it comes down to what the editor wants; I think Anolis is better because the end user experience is better. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 18:30:54 UTC