- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:12:19 +0300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 04/25/2012 12:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:02:22 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >>> (DOM3's language >>> about "default actions" confuses this; I suggest reading DOM4's event >>> section to get a good picture of how this actually works.) >> >> Or rather how the DOM4 editor is choosing to conceptualize it, which >> may not have much bearing on how it actually works in actual browsers. > > Last time I discussed this with Jonas Sicking he agreed that Gecko could > change some things here and he also agreed with the model put forward. It is not only about Gecko, but all the browser engines, at least last time I tested it. > If the model is wrong we should fix it of course. > > It does indeed not apply universally and as far as I know HTML does > cater for those exceptions in various ways. It would be interesting to > know where it does not. > > I'm not sure how extensions are relevant here. If you allow them to do > complex things then of course they will be complex to implement, but > there is not much we can do about that. > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 05:13:13 UTC