W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:18:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4FE3031C.80002@nokia.com>
To: ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/21/12 5:16 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, fantasai
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  wrote:
>> You could just work in the explanation I sent in
>>   http://www.w3.org/mid/4FC64100.3060800@inkedblade.net
> Added a note.
> The reason this is not very elaborated is that this really belongs in
> a CSS specification that defines the layout box model and painting
> order etc. in detail. As part of that you would have the top layer
> concept and ways to hook into it via pseudo-elements, such as
> ::backdrop. And some non-normative description around it to aid people
> new to the material.
> Having this in Fullscreen is just patching holes in the CSS 2.1
> specification, which is not a great way to do things.

Daniel, Fantasai - please confirm whether or not Anne's latest changes 
([1],[2]) address the "#2 issue" ([3]) that is blocking FPWD:


-Thanks, AB

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/rev/41052063ef66
[2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/rev/23f36a1db497
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/1252.html
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 11:19:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC