- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:07:54 -0700
- To: "Webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Wed, 02 May 2012 13:46:27 -0700, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I certainly agree that it would be better to move the definition of > when to throw exceptions into the prose for each function and > attribute, but that's a big change that I don't think we should block > on. (In fact, it might be big enough that we don't want to take it on > at all, but that's something we shouldn't decide on here). Is the order of exceptions defined? E.g. if a method can throw two different exceptions and you violate both requirements, which exception throws? That's one of the minor problems this legacy DOM-style gives. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 21:08:38 UTC