- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 10:05:20 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> > What happens if it doesn't pass? >> >> I guess we'll reevaluate then. > > How would this be different than what we've been doing for the past year? > > As far as I can tell, the current situation is that we've stopped work on > XBL2 -- at least, nobody has worked on it for ages, and nobody is planning > on working on it any time soon. But if we actually _decide_ to stop > working on it, then we'll have to _start_ working on it again, in order to > publish a note saying we're not working on it, whereas if we decide _not_ > to stop working on it, we'll continue doing nothing, having stopped > working on it. > > This is like the epitome of committee-driven nonsense. So you're blocking the resolution on Process grounds? ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 17:06:09 UTC