- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:51:57 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:46 PM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > (Starting a new thread by replying to a mail and then changing the > subject and quoted text is not a good idea; just start a new mail.) Guilty as charged. Sorry, won't happen again. >> I recently stumbled upon a number of use case and requirements docs (such >> as MediaStream Capture Scenarios[1] or HTML Speech XG[2]) that were >> published as officially looking W3C documents (for whatever that means, at >> least, it's not a page on a Wiki). > > Only documents under http://www.w3.org/TR/ are official publications > as far as Working Group's Technical Reports go. Can't WG release notes? --tobie
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 19:56:45 UTC