- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:46:14 +0200
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
* Tobie Langel wrote: >Hi, (Starting a new thread by replying to a mail and then changing the subject and quoted text is not a good idea; just start a new mail.) >I recently stumbled upon a number of use case and requirements docs (such >as MediaStream Capture Scenarios[1] or HTML Speech XG[2]) that were >published as officially looking W3C documents (for whatever that means, at >least, it's not a page on a Wiki). Only documents under http://www.w3.org/TR/ are official publications as far as Working Group's Technical Reports go. The documents above should follow policy http://www.w3.org/2005/03/28-editor-style.html for unpublished drafts, like not using "Working Draft" branding, but currently don't. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 18:46:44 UTC