- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:28:31 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi All, I created a tracking document for the two comments and five bugs that were submitted against the 24 May LCWD of Web Sockets (or in the approximate time frame of that publication): <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Websockets-Comments-LC-24May2012>. Below is my "take" on these bugs and comments. It would be good to get this spec back to CR and hence closer toward the IP commitments that will only be final when the spec reaches Recommendation. Bugs: * 17073 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17073> - marked as an Enhancement; don't include in the v1 CR * 17224 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17224> - this looks like an Editorial bug to me as I stated in the bug. Assuming there is consensus the text should be "unsolicited pongs", if Hixie can't fix this before the v1 CR copy is created, I'll make this change in the v1 CR. * 17262 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17262> - Jonas' view as expressed in <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17262#c13> seems reasonable so I propose closing this with a resolution of WorksForMe. * 17263 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17263> - send(ArrayBuffer), which was included in the December 2011 CR, has been implemented and presumably must be supported by some browsers (e.g. bc/legacy reasons). As such, it seems reasonable to fix this bug and perhaps we could argue a new LCWD is not needed since it has already been implemented. * 17264 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17264> - this bug appears to be a rehash of bug 13104 which was Fixed in October 2011 so I propose closing this with a resolution of Duplicate. Comments: * LC-1 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0807.html> - The 28-May-2012 reply by Takeshi Yoshino notes this is a Chrome bug and not a spec bug. The 1-June-2012 reply by Simon Pieters indicates the Protocol spec needs to be updated. As such, I don't think any changes are needed for v1 of the spec. * LC-2 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0880.html> - This is an editorial bug and is already captured in Bug 12510. Ideally, this bug would be fixed before the v1 CR branch is created. However, if Hixie can't fix it before then and if no one else creates an acceptable patch for Hixie, I don't support blocking the v1 CR for this. Please send all comments by June 28. -Thanks, AB
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 14:29:00 UTC