- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:12:49 -0400
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-webapps@w3.org, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
And just to be clear, the discussion about security and document.domain is somewhat orthogonal to the original issue. WebIDL requires that all objects be associated with a particular global and that any spec defining anything that creates an object needs to define how this association is set up. For the particular case of constructors, that means that either WebIDL needs to have a default (that particular specs may be able to override) or that any spec that uses constructors needs to explicitly define the global association (which is not quite identical to things like which origin and base URI are used). -Boris
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 22:13:19 UTC