- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:03:54 +0000
- To: Fabrice Desre <fabrice@mozilla.com>
- CC: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-native-web-apps@w3.org" <public-native-web-apps@w3.org>
On 6/2/12 6:54 AM, "Fabrice Desre" <fabrice@mozilla.com> wrote: >On 06/01/2012 02:36 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: >> On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com >> <mailto:w3c@marcosc.com>> wrote: >> >>> Sounds good. AFAICT, Moz's proposal doesn't really cover packaging >>> either ... Not in the sense of wrapping the app using zip or >>> something. More metadata, feature control (potentially relevant to >>> requiring certain SysApps API), and lifecycle management. >> >> Agreed. I'd be curious to see how it's planning to interact with >> AppCache (if at all). Also whether integration with a JSON version of >> AppCache has been considered. > >We're working on pre-loading the appcache at install time when the >appcache path is specified in the manifest. See >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702369 for the b2g support, >and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753990 for desktop >support. That sounds nice. How do normal web pages link to their own config file? I haven't seen that mentioned in the spec draft. --tobie
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 10:06:55 UTC