Re: [manifest] Is the Webapp Manifest spec ready for FPWD?

On 6/2/12 6:54 AM, "Fabrice Desre" <> wrote:

>On 06/01/2012 02:36 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <
>> <>> wrote:
>>> Sounds good. AFAICT, Moz's proposal doesn't really cover packaging
>>> either ... Not in the sense of wrapping the app using zip or
>>> something. More metadata, feature control (potentially relevant to
>>> requiring certain SysApps API), and lifecycle management.
>> Agreed. I'd be curious to see how it's planning to interact with
>> AppCache (if at all). Also whether integration with a JSON version of
>> AppCache has been considered.
>We're working on pre-loading the appcache at install time when the
>appcache path is specified in the manifest. See
> for the b2g support,
>and for desktop

That sounds nice. How do normal web pages link to their own config file? I
haven't seen that mentioned in the spec draft.


Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 10:06:55 UTC