- From: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:49:29 -0700
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > On 4/11/2012 2:41 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Boris Zbarsky<bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> > Seems like right now passing a typed array to send() requires a bit of >>> > extra >>> > hoop-jumping to pass the .buffer instead, right? Is that desirable? >> >> It may be convenient to add an overload to send() (presumably on both >> XHR and WebSocket? Any others?) accepting ArrayBufferView. As pointed > > > It's convenient. > > xhr.send(view); // shorthand > xhr.send(view.buffer.slice(view.byteOffset, > view.byteOffset+view.byteLength)); // longhand. > > Kenneth, > > Can we get a voice from MS? They've been supporting typed arrays in IE10 for > awhile. > If we're going to have this method, I'd really like to see it in IE10. I have no control over that -- I believe there are representatives from Microsoft that monitor this list and hope they will voice an opinion. -Ken > Boris, How do we feature test for support of the shorthand method? > > > -Charles >
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 21:49:57 UTC