W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Howto spec

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:48:52 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+c9yXsxyeOgUprcZLPMXVZ_Cajm-EBVeHA-d24voP4sQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>wrote:
>> This is neat! I especially appreciated the Method/Attribute patterns.
>> I will use this.
>> Should I be concerned about what seems to be a lively competition
>> between ReSpec and Anolis. Do we need this tussle? Can we not just
>> decide which tool to use?
> editor tools are at the editors' prerogative, so we should not mandate
> specific tools i think
> in fact, i am not completely happy with either respec or anolis, and have
> put together something of a hybrid i'm using on cssom*;  in particular,
> what i'm doing is:
>    - writing all IDL and related documentation in WebIDL format, with
>    each top-level definition in a distinct file, while using 'Documentation'
>    extended attributes in the WebIDL files that contains both substitution
>    patterns and markup, rather akin to javadoc but with different substitution
>    keywords that better pertain to the WebIDL usage context;
>    - use a driver file with CPP includes, then running (gnu) CPP to
>    create a single IDL resource for the subsequent processing
>    - use robin's WebIDLParser.js [1] (via node.js) to validate and dump
>    JSON representation of IDL
>    - use Aria Stewart's (aredridel) HTML5.js parser [2] (via node.js) to
>    parse then serialize with substitution replacement based on the JSON IDL,
>    e.g., <!--widl(MediaList)--> is replaced with an HTML5 representation of
>    the MediaList IDL, <!--widl-intro(MediaList)-->,
>    <!--widl-attrs(MediaList)-->, <!--widl-methods(MediaList)-->, etc., get the
>    associated documentation
>    - finally use anolis to perform other substitutions, toc generation,
>    etc.
> the reason I'm doing this is because i prefer embedding documentation in
> IDL sources than embedding IDL in HTML sources; i also want to do all
> processing at authoring time, and not at load time via the ReSpec approach
> once i'm satisfied with this approach, i'll post it and document with a
> wiki in case some other editor wishes to use this method; but, again, i
> think which approach is used should be left to specific editors, since it
> affects their productivity
> cheers, glenn

relevant links

[1] https://github.com/darobin/webidl.js
[2] https://github.com/aredridel/html5
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 17:49:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC