On 5/14/12 8:58 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: > I agree... Can we get this off the main thread? "Maybe". It would be pretty nontrivial in Gecko; last I looked it would be pretty painful in WebKit too. Can't speak for other UAs. > Svg via image is not quite the same as svg via HTMLDocument (I guess I mean, embedded). Sure, but that doesn't matter. > Afaik, svg via image does not have any script controls but it does have xsl things. And CSS. > Put in other words:<img src=image.svg> may use an entirely different implementation than<svg> in an HTML document. It _may_, but it would likely be pretty buggy. And at least in Gecko, I don't think we're willing to duplicate enough of the rendering engine to do this. -BorisReceived on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 01:09:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC