- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:10:04 -0400
- To: ext Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/19/12 3:52 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote: > Le 18/06/12 13:09, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >> On 5/30/12 10:38 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote: >>> Le 30/05/12 14:43, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >>> >>>> Chris, Daniel, Peter - when will the CSS WG make a decision on the >>>> FPWD? >>> >>> We'll try to make one today during our weekly conf-call. Please note >>> that we're going to review the bits of this document falling under CSS >>> WG's wings. In particular section 6. Peter and I already have >>> discovered >>> a few things : >>> >>> 1. "position: center" in section 6.1 refers to an Editor's Draft >>> that is >>> not actively discussed at this time. Only normative references >>> should be made to CSS specs or the Fullscreen draft will have to wait >>> until that ED becomes a REC to itself become a REC. >>> >>> 2. the ::backdrop pseudo-element is not explained in the document >>> outside of section 6.2. It's unclear to me why it is needed, what >>> it represents, etc. >>> >>> 3. the parenthesis in section 6.2 seems to me to contain a copy/paste >>> error "above the element below the element" >>> >>> 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used >>> nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified. >> >> Does the latest ED >> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> address >> the above concerns? > > No, item 2 above is still not addressed, and I guess most readers > of the document won't understand what functionally represents > ::backdrop. > >>> 1. the definition of requestFullScreen() says what are the steps it >>> should run but it does not even say what feature it provides. I think >>> a sentence saying "The requestFullScreen() method sends a request for >>> the Element to go fullscreen. Please see section 7 for the Security >>> Considerations attached to this method." is needed. >>> >>> 2. allowfullscreen and iframe in section 7 should be hyperlinks. I note >>> the reference is at WHATWG while it should be at W3C. > > These two points are still unaddressed too. My interpretation of your comments is the first set (#1-#4 above) are considered FPWD Showstoppers by the CSS WG and the second set of comments (#1-#2) were your personal comments (since they are related to the API and process) and as such, Not FPWD Showstoppers. Given this interpretation - and of course, please correct it if it is wrong - it appears the only remaining FPWD Showstopper is #2 in the first set of comments. Is that correct? (FYI, before the FPWD is published in /TR/, the HTML reference will use a link to the W3C's HTML5 spec.) -Thanks, AB
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 12:10:33 UTC