W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:10:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4FE06C1C.9070903@nokia.com>
To: ext Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/19/12 3:52 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Le 18/06/12 13:09, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>> On 5/30/12 10:38 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote:
>>> Le 30/05/12 14:43, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>>>> Chris, Daniel, Peter - when will the CSS WG make a decision on the 
>>>> FPWD?
>>> We'll try to make one today during our weekly conf-call. Please note
>>> that we're going to review the bits of this document falling under CSS
>>> WG's wings. In particular section 6. Peter and I already have 
>>> discovered
>>> a few things :
>>> 1. "position: center" in section 6.1 refers to an Editor's Draft 
>>> that is
>>> not actively discussed at this time. Only normative references
>>> should be made to CSS specs or the Fullscreen draft will have to wait
>>> until that ED becomes a REC to itself become a REC.
>>> 2. the ::backdrop pseudo-element is not explained in the document
>>> outside of section 6.2. It's unclear to me why it is needed, what
>>> it represents, etc.
>>> 3. the parenthesis in section 6.2 seems to me to contain a copy/paste
>>> error "above the element below the element"
>>> 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used
>>> nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified.
>> Does the latest ED
>> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> address
>> the above concerns?
> No, item 2 above is still not addressed, and I guess most readers
> of the document won't understand what functionally represents
> ::backdrop.
>>> 1. the definition of requestFullScreen() says what are the steps it
>>> should run but it does not even say what feature it provides. I think
>>> a sentence saying "The requestFullScreen() method sends a request for
>>> the Element to go fullscreen. Please see section 7 for the Security
>>> Considerations attached to this method." is needed.
>>> 2. allowfullscreen and iframe in section 7 should be hyperlinks. I note
>>> the reference is at WHATWG while it should be at W3C.
> These two points are still unaddressed too.

My interpretation of your comments is the first set (#1-#4 above) are 
considered FPWD Showstoppers by the CSS WG and the second set of 
comments (#1-#2) were your personal comments (since they are related to 
the API and process) and as such, Not FPWD Showstoppers.

Given this interpretation - and of course, please correct it if it is 
wrong - it appears the only remaining FPWD Showstopper is #2 in the 
first set of comments. Is that correct?

(FYI, before the FPWD is published in /TR/, the HTML reference will use 
a link to the W3C's HTML5 spec.)

-Thanks, AB
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 12:10:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC