- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:42:44 +0000
- To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- CC: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@chromium.org>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric U <ericu@google.com>
On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:14, "Ms2ger" <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/27/2012 05:44 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:44 AM, "Glenn Maynard"<glenn@zewt.org> wrote: >>> Unrelated, screaming-caps on RFC2119 terms (eg. "MUST") is jarring >>> and unnecessary. I'd suggest dropping the em.rfc2119 style. >>> That's what HTML, DOM4, etc. do, and it's much more readable. >> >> How do you distinguish between 'MUST' and 'must' then? I agree the >> style is jarring, but maybe that can be fixed rather then completely >> removed. > > Specifications must not use RFC2119 keywords to mean anything else than the meaning RFC2119 assigns to those keywords. > > HTH > Ms2ger Wasn't aware. Thanks for the clarification. --tobie
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 16:43:20 UTC