Re: Implied Context Parsing (DocumentFragment.innerHTML, or similar) proposal details to be sorted out

Yehuda,

Can you help clarify here whether jQuery's behavior is intentional
(i.e. use cases drive the need for executability), or if it's a
side-effect of the implementation?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote:
>> > There appears to be a consensus to use document.parse (which is fine
>> > with
>> > me), so I would like to double-check which behavior we're picking. IMO,
>> > the
>> > only sane choice is to unset the already-started flag since doing
>> > otherwise
>> > implies script elements parsed by document.parse won't be executed when
>> > inserted into a document.
>>
>> I was expecting document.parse() to make scripts unexecutable. Are
>> there use cases for creating executable scripts using this facility?
>
>
> jQuery appears to let script elements run: http://jsfiddle.net/kB8Fp/2/
>
> Also, we're talking about using the same algorithm for template element.
> I would like script elements inside my template to run.
>
> - Ryosuke
>

Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 09:01:39 UTC